A rocket burns out at an altitude h above the Earth's surface

AI Thread Summary
A rocket burns out at an altitude h, and its speed at burnout exceeds the escape speed for that altitude. The kinetic energy equation is applied to relate initial and final states, leading to the expression for the rocket's speed far from Earth. The variables r1 and r2 represent the initial altitude and a point very far away, respectively, with potential energy at the far point considered zero. Clarification on these variables helped resolve confusion, confirming that the final potential energy is zero, allowing for the correct calculation of the rocket's speed. The discussion emphasizes understanding energy conservation in the context of escape velocity.
Benjamin Fogiel
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rocket burns out at an altitude h above the Earth's surface. Its speed v0 at burnout exceeds the escape speed vesc appropriate to the burnout altitude. Show that the speed v of the rocket very far from the Earth is given by v=(v02-v2esc)1/2

Homework Equations


KEf-KEi=Ui-Uf

The Attempt at a Solution


I plugged in the values of kinetic and potential energies:

(m1v2)/2 - (m1v02)/2 = (-Gm1m2)/r1 + (Gm1m2)/r2

Simplified to get:

v2=(-2Gm2)/r1 + (2Gm2)/r2 + v02

Im not sure where to go from here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are ##r_1## and ##r_2##?

Escape velocity for mass ##m_1## to escape mass ##m_2## starting at distance ##r## is the value such that ##(1/2)m_1v_0^2 = G m_1 m_2/r##. In other words, added to the initial potential energy, you get a total energy of 0, which means that the mass ##m_1## will not stop before reaching potential energy 0 at "infinite" or "very far away" distance.

Perhaps that will help?

The intent of the phrase "very far away" refers to the zero point of potential energy. So you can just use 0 for PE.
 
r1 = h
r2 = "very far away"

Sorry, forgot to define those values.

Yes, that helped! So Uf is essentially zero which then gives me the right answer.

Thank you.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top