A small mass on a wedge having a stationary circular track

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a small mass sliding down a wedge with a stationary circular track, where the mass of the wedge is twice that of the sliding mass. The presence of friction between the wedge and the horizontal surface is noted, and participants are tasked with drawing a graph of frictional force versus angle theta.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conditions of the problem, particularly the presence of friction and whether the track is sliding. Questions arise about the net forces acting on the mass and the role of the normal force in providing centripetal acceleration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the assumptions made in the problem statement and exploring the implications of the wedge's mass and the forces acting on the mass. Some guidance has been offered regarding the drawing of free body diagrams and the relationship between forces, but no consensus has been reached on the exact approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the completeness of the problem statement, with participants suggesting that important details may be missing or misinterpreted. The discussion reflects a focus on clarifying these aspects before proceeding with the graphing task.

Kaushik
Messages
282
Reaction score
17
Homework Statement
A small mass of ##m## starts sliding down a wedge which is having a stationary circular track on it. If ##M = 2m## and friction exists between the wedge and the horizontal surface. Draw the Frictional force vs Theta graph.
Relevant Equations
Attached
A small mass of ##m## starts sliding down a wedge which is having a stationary circular track on it. If ##M = 2m## and friction exists between the wedge and the horizontal surface. Draw the Frictional force vs Theta graph.

How to draw the graph?

Please HELP
Screen Shot 2019-07-29 at 12.30.52 PM.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the statement of the problem exactly how it was given to you? I am asking because two important questions need be answered
1. Is there friction between mass ##m## and the track?
2. Is the track sliding on the surface?
If the answer is "no" to both questions, then find ##v(\theta)## and then draw a FBD of the track. Use the FBD to find the force of static friction as a function of ##\theta## and then plot it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kaushik
kuruman said:
Is the track sliding on the surface?
We are told it is stationary.
 
haruspex said:
We are told it is stationary.
Yes, I missed that at first.
 
kuruman said:
Is the statement of the problem exactly how it was given to you?
This was the exact question. Is it incomplete? There might be some mistake in the question itself.
 
kuruman said:
Yes, I missed that at first.
But then, why give the mass of the wedge? Just to confuse?
 
Kaushik said:
This was the exact question. Is it incomplete? There might be some mistake in the question itself.
I would assume the wedge is stationary and there is no friction between it and the mass.
What must be the net force on the mass at the position shown?
 
haruspex said:
What must be the net force on the mass at the position shown?
Are you asking when it makes 0 degree with the horizontal?
Is it ##mg##?
 
Last edited:
Kaushik said:
Are you asking when it makes 0 degree with the horizontal?
No, in the diagram position, at angle theta below starting point.
Kaushik said:
Tension
Tension? Tension in what?
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
No, in the diagram position, at angle theta below starting point.
Is it ##mgcosΘ##?
haruspex said:
Tension? Tension in what?
Sorry, there is no tension acting here.
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
But then, why give the mass of the wedge? Just to confuse?
Perhaps to draw an upper limit in the graph assuming a ##\mu_s## or maybe this probelm is derived from an incompletely modified earlier version in which the wedge was free to move on a frictionless table and one was asked for a plot of the wedge's displacement vs. angle.
 
  • #12
Kaushik said:
Is it ##mgcosΘ##?
Please show your work. What leads you to guess ##m g \cos \theta##? Have you drawn a free body diagram? For what object? Have you accounted for the acceleration of the ball in its track?

Edit: Expanding a bit on this.

When we look at the classic situation of a block sliding down an inclined plane, one can use a coordinate system lined up with the diagonal surface of the plane. In this coordinate system the acceleration on the y-axis (perpendicular to the plane) is zero. If follows that one can equate the normal force on the block from the plane to the y component of gravity: ##F = m g \cos \theta##.

This holds because the acceleration in the perpendicular direction is zero. The two forces have to sum to zero.

But we do not have a flat inclined plane. In the case at hand, is the acceleration perpendicular to the curved surface equal to zero?
 
Last edited:
  • #13
jbriggs444 said:
But we do not have a flat inclined plane. In the case at hand, is the acceleration perpendicular to the curved surface equal to zero?
The ##Normal## provides the centripetal acceleration.
 
  • #14
Kaushik said:
The ##Normal## provides the centripetal acceleration.
The net of all forces normal to the surface provides the centripetal acceleration. The "normal force" from the wedge is not the only contribution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kaushik
  • #15
haruspex said:
The net of all forces normal to the surface provides the centripetal acceleration. The "normal force" from the wedge is not the only contribution.
The only forces that are normal to the surface at angle ##\theta## are Normal and ##mg\sin(\theta)##. Am I correct?
 
  • #16
Kaushik said:
The only forces that are normal to the surface at angle ##\theta## are Normal and ##mg\sin(\theta)##. Am I correct?
Yes.
 
  • #17
haruspex said:
Yes.
Now should I draw the FBD of the wedge?
 
  • #18
Kaushik said:
Now should I draw the FBD of the wedge?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K