A typical compound archery bow requiers

  • Thread starter Thread starter r-soy
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A typical compound archery bow requires a force of 133 N to hold an arrow at full draw, which is 71 cm. The spring constant can be calculated using the formula k = W/x, resulting in approximately 1.87 N/m. However, the problem is criticized for oversimplifying the mechanics of a compound bow, as its spring constant is not constant throughout the draw. The force required to hold the bow at full draw is less than that needed to draw it initially, making the application of Hooke's law questionable. Ultimately, the correct answer for the spring constant is noted as 187.3 N/m.
r-soy
Messages
170
Reaction score
1
A typical compound archery bow requiers a force of 133 N to hold an arrow at "full drwa " ( pulled back 71 cm ). ssunimg that the bow obeys hooke's law . what is its spring constant ?



did conver 71 to m

did use k = W/x to find spring constant ?



plese help me ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi

F =W/x= 133N/.71 m= 1.87N/m.



??
 
This is kind of a stupid problem. A compound bow is specifically constructed so that its "spring constant" is not constant. If you've ever pulled one, you know that it takes much less force to hold it at full draw than it does to get it there. For a spring, F=-kx tells you that the force increases steadily as you increase the displacement, whereas for a compound bow F increases, then decreases again until you get to full draw.
 
r-soy said:
133N/.71 m= 1.87N/m

Replace batteries in your calculator.
 
hhhhhhhhhhhh

loooooooool
sorry the answer is 187.3
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top