- #71
drag
Science Advisor
- 1,097
- 1
Originally posted by Tom
When someone wants to sieze upon the small
uncertainty, then we have to look at what
they want to replace it with.
In this case, it is proposed that the natural
workings of the universe be replaced with an
omnicient, omnipotent, omnipresent Mind that
once existed in a changeless state, and has
left no evidence of its existence except one
fanatic who calls himself lifegazer.
I was kin'na talking about the timeless Universe
part, but this is funny. (No offense LG !
Nevertheless, although it is correct to deny
the "apparent" evidence LG often presents without
a real basis, I think that you should always
remember that "small uncertainty" you yourself
mentioned. That "small uncertainty" is very useful
(I'm starting to sound like Wu Li ) because
it commands respect towards any idea.
Besides, you have no way of quantifying it -
so maybe it's really very large...
Live long and prosper.