A very stupid question, calculation problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter cubejunkies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation Stupid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a calculation problem involving the spread of oil over water to form a monolayer. The correct length of one oil molecule is stated to be 2.5 nanometers, but the user consistently arrives at 25 nanometers due to a decimal error. Participants suggest a systematic approach to unit conversion, emphasizing the importance of keeping volume and surface area distinct. The user considers converting units to centimeters squared but is reminded that volume and surface area are not interchangeable. The conversation highlights the need for careful calculations and unit consistency in solving the problem.
cubejunkies
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
0.10 mL of oil can spread over a surface of 40 m^2 of water in a film one molecule thick to prevent the water from evaporating as fast. If one nanometer is 1 x 10^-9 meters, what is the length of one oil molecule in nanometers?

Ok so this is a really stupid question, but I got the correct number, but my decimal is in the wrong place, and I've done the problem over and over and over so there's something wrong in my calculations. The correct answer is 2.5 nanometers, but I always get 25 nanometers. Heres my thought process:

0.10 mL/ 100 cm * 0.10 mL/40 m^2/100 cm/1*10^-9 = 2.5*10^1

This is a really stupid question and I apologize
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What unit is your answer in?
 
cm*nm/m :( i tried multiplying by (1m/100 cm) again as a fudge factor, bu then it made the answer 2.5*10^-1 obviously so idk
 
It looks to me like you are using conversion factors at random. Try to make it in a systematic way. For example - convert everything to meters (meters, squared meters and cubed meters).
 
okay, and since mL are cm^3 and its a monolayer of oil, could i make it into cm^2 because of that?
 
No, volume and surface are different things.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top