A very weird improper integral on ^n

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
raopeng
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Verify that [itex]\int_{ℝ^n}exp(-\frac{λ}{2} \langle Ax, x \rangle-i \langle x,ζ \rangle )dx=(\frac{2\pi}{λ})^{\frac{1}{2}}(detA)^{-\frac{1}{2}}exp(-\frac{1}{2λ} \langle A^{-1}ζ, ζ \rangle )[/itex] where A is a symmetric matrix of complex numbers and <ReA x, x> is positive definite, and λ is a positive constant. ζ is a vector in ℝ^n

Homework Equations


Fubini's Theorem?

The Attempt at a Solution


The question is a lot easier if A is brought to diagonal form, so it is reasonable to make a change of variable that x= C y where C belongs to SO(n) such that C^-1 A C = B is diagonal. Since this change of variables means only geometrically a rotation of the R^n plane it should not change the range of values for integrating(still from -∞ to ∞). After this transformation we should be able to apply Fubini's Theorem and perform an iterated integration. But in the exponential function [itex]exp(-i\langle Cy, ζ \rangle)[/itex] is still left to be dealt with and it doesn't come any where close that it could be of the form [itex]exp(-\frac{1}{2λ} \langle A^{-1}ζ, ζ \rangle)[/itex] after integration as the answer suggests.. right now I'm trully stuck here.. Thanks for any help in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
det A here means [itex]|det A| exp(i \sum_0^n{arg w_i})[/itex] where w is the eigenvalue of A.
This question even takes 20 minutes to type.. or I really suck at latex..