A wheel is making 240 rpm and after 30 sec and after 30 sec

  • Thread starter Thread starter manal950
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rpm Wheel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a wheel initially spinning at 240 rpm that slows to 150 rpm after 30 seconds. The calculations for the time it takes to stop completely and the confusion regarding the second part of the question are central to the conversation. The first part indicates that the wheel takes 94.4 seconds to stop from 150 rpm, while the total time to stop from 240 rpm is 80 seconds when calculated more simply. Participants express confusion over the relevance of the second part of the question, questioning what is meant by the time elapsed after the wheel stops, as it remains stationary indefinitely. Clarification on the question's intent is suggested, as the scenario lacks further action after the wheel comes to a stop.
manal950
Messages
177
Reaction score
0
1 ) A wheel is making 240 rpm and after 30 sec and after 30 sec it is running at 150 rpm .
A) Find the time elapse before it stops if the retardation is uniform ?
B) Find the time elapse after it stops if the retardation is uniform ?

my answer :

w0 = 240 rpm = 8Pi rad/s
w = 240 rpm = 5pi rad/s
t = 30

------

w = w0 + at
a = -0.1Pi

time elapse before it stops
w = w0 + at
5pi = 8Pi - 0.1Pi (t)
t = 94.4 s

time elapse after it stops
w = w0 + at
5pi = 0 - 0.1Pi (t)
t = 50 s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
correct
 
manal950 said:
1 ) A wheel is making 240 rpm and after 30 sec and after 30 sec it is running at 150 rpm .
A) Find the time elapse before it stops if the retardation is uniform ?
B) Find the time elapse after it stops if the retardation is uniform ?

Something is wrong, or missing, from the question. Why is "and after 30 sec" mentioned twice? Also, part A makes sense, but part B does not. After the wheel stops, it remains stationary and that's it - what elapsed time are they expecting one to calculate?

my answer :

w0 = 240 rpm = 8Pi rad/s
w = 240 rpm = 5pi rad/s
t = 30

------

w = w0 + at
a = -0.1Pi

This is correct so far. I presume you did this:

8\pi = 5\pi + a(30)

to get this value of a?

time elapse before it stops
w = w0 + at
5pi = 8Pi - 0.1Pi (t)
t = 94.4 s

How can this be right? You're basically using the same equation as above, but you're getting a different value for t! You should just get t = 30s, but you're just unnecessarily recalculating a value already given in the question.

time elapse after it stops
w = w0 + at
5pi = 0 - 0.1Pi (t)
t = 50 s

This is correct. Specifically, this is the additional time the wheel takes to come to a rest after it's already slowed to 150 rpm. The total time taken to slow down from 240 rpm to 0 rpm is 80s, but that can just be calculated by adding 30s and 50s.

The much simpler way to do this is to simply say that if the wheel takes 30s to retard from 240 rpm to 150 rpm, the retardation is \frac{(240-150) rpm}{30s}= 3 rpm/s.

Hence to come to a complete stop, the wheel would take: \frac{(240-0) rpm}{3 rpm/s} = 80s.
 
1 ) A wheel is making 240 rpm and after 30 sec it is running at 150 rpm .
A) Find the time elapse before it stops if the retardation is uniform ?
B) Find the time elapse after it stops if the retardation is uniform ?

sorry now the question correct

what is you mean by but part B does no has sense "
 
thaaaaaaaaaanks so much
 
Last edited:
manal950 said:
1 ) A wheel is making 240 rpm and after 30 sec it is running at 150 rpm .
A) Find the time elapse before it stops if the retardation is uniform ?
B) Find the time elapse after it stops if the retardation is uniform ?

sorry now the question correct

what is you mean by but part B does no has sense "

t = 0s, wheel is spinning at 240 rpm
t = 30s, wheel has slowed to 150 rpm
t = 80s, wheel has slowed to a complete stop
t = 81s, wheel remains stopped
t = 90s, wheel remains stopped
t = 100s, wheel remains stopped
...
t = ∞ , wheel remains stopped.

There's nothing new happening after the wheel comes to a stop, so what is part B) expecting?

It is entirely possible that the wheel after instantaneously coming to a stop, is immediately made to spin in the other direction, but this is not specified in the question, and one cannot assume it. And even then, the question still doesn't make sense.

Do you understand what part B) is asking for? If so, please explain it to me. But if, like me, you also don't understand, please clarify with your instructor/teacher.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top