? about magnifying lens/parabolic mirrors steam turbine electric generator

AI Thread Summary
Using magnifying lenses or parabolic mirrors to evaporate water for steam turbine electric generators can capture about 1kW of solar power per square meter. However, the efficiency of converting heat into mechanical power is lower compared to photovoltaic (PV) cells. There is a discussion about the cost-effectiveness of solar heating generators versus solar panel arrays, with heating being cheaper but heat engines being less efficient. The UK government's feed-in tariff incentivizes small-scale electricity generation, although some users find the associated fees outweigh the benefits. Overall, while solar thermal systems have potential, their practicality compared to PV systems remains in question.
Newtype
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Ok here's an idea that isn't a perpetual motion machine (it's no more perpetual than solar cells):

Using a big magnifying lens or parabolic mirrors, what are the formulas when either of them are used to evaporate water into water vapor steam to move a turbine to power an electric generator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To get an idea of the upper limit to the power that such a device could transfer, each metre square of collecting area would capture 1kW of solar power. If you could focus the radiation to produce a nice high temperature then you could perhaps think of getting a small fraction of that in mechanical power. I have a feeling that PV cells would do better; heat engines are not the best way of transferring energy if there is alternative.
 
Sohpie, do you know what the cost comparison is between a solar panel array and a solar heating generator producing equal power?
 
Heating is cheap but a heat engine is not.
And the feed in tarif is good.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Heating is cheap but a heat engine is not.
And the feed in tarif is good.

Feed in tarif?
 
An 'in joke'. The UK government makes the electricity supply companies pay a laughably high rate for small scale feeds to the National Grid.
 
sophiecentaur said:
An 'in joke'. The UK government makes the electricity supply companies pay a laughably high rate for small scale feeds to the National Grid.

I think the power company here does the same thing to people who want to tie their own power into the grid as well. I looked into it and it turned out that I would be paying more just in fees than I would make up for by adding enough solar power to cover 50% of my average power use.
 
In the south UK, if you have no shadows, then you are very much in profit over several years - if the governmen its word.t keep
 

Similar threads

Back
Top