AC Motor Reversing: Is It Possible?

AI Thread Summary
Running an AC motor with a nominal torque of 100 ft*lbs against a load of 200 ft*lbs torque is not feasible, as the motor cannot produce enough torque to overcome the load, leading to a stall. If the motor were to spin in the opposite direction due to an external force, it could quickly sustain damage, particularly if the rotor spins against the magnetic field. The type of load—static or dynamic—affects the motor's performance, and overheating is a risk if the motor is pushed beyond its maximum torque. Additionally, if the opposing force is another motor, it would require energy from an external source, as energy conservation principles apply. Sustaining such a condition is not practical without risking motor failure.
omalleyt
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Say I have an AC motor with 100 ft*lbs torque, and I run it against a load of 200 ft*lbs torque so that the motor spins in the opposite direction of the power it is providing. Is this possible, and if so can this condition be sustained over a period of time without damaging the motor?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
omalleyt said:
Say I have an AC motor with 100 ft*lbs torque, and I run it against a load of 200 ft*lbs torque so that the motor spins in the opposite direction of the power it is providing. Is this possible, and if so can this condition be sustained over a period of time without damaging the motor?

You are talking about nominal torque of AC motor ? If so, there is also a parameter called critical or maximal torque. It's bigger than nominal torque so the motor can work properly (stabile work) up to the maximal torque. The power drain will be increased, motor may be overheated.

It all depends what kind of load is that, is it a static load, a fan-type or some other. Other important thing is are You starting your motor or just adding load to spinning machine.

In worst case - rotor spinning in opposite directoion to the field - It would damage the motor rather quickly.
 
I may have misunderstood, but it looks like what you are calling a "load" is actually something that is adding energy to the system. If you really connect a motor capable of 100 ft*lbs torque to a load that requires 200 ft*lbs torque, then the motor will simply stop because it couldn't produce the required torque to turn the shaft of that load. But if I've misunderstood, and the thing you call a "load" is actually pushing the motor in the opposite direction, then by definition you probably shouldn't call that a "load". Rather, it would be some device like a motor which produces 200ft*lbs of torque (in the opposite direction of the first motor) and would, therefore, have to get that energy from some other source--because energy is of course conserved.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top