Accelerating spaceship paradox

yeknod71
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Please consider:

At time zero a spaceship takes off from Earth and keeps traveling under constant acceleration.

From Earth's perspective, the spaceship's speed keeps increasing but never reaches c. Also from Earth's perspective, the clock on the spaceship keeps slowing down and asymtotes a certain time value (let's call tMax).

However, from spaceship's perspective, their clock has not slowed down and passes tMax. They can take a photograph of their clock showing greater values than tMax, and return to earth. It can be arranged that in the background of this photograph there is evidence that it was taken before the spaceship turned around. How will observers on Earth explain this photograph?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yeknod71 said:
Hi,

Please consider:

At time zero a spaceship takes off from Earth and keeps traveling under constant acceleration.

From Earth's perspective, the spaceship's speed keeps increasing but never reaches c. Also from Earth's perspective, the clock on the spaceship keeps slowing down and asymtotes a certain time value (let's call tMax).
No such value as tMax exists. From Earth, the ship clock does slow down as it approaches c, but so does the rate at which the ship approaches c. There is no maximum value that the ship clock can read as seen from Earth.
However, from spaceship's perspective, their clock has not slowed down and passes tMax. They can take a photograph of their clock showing greater values than tMax, and return to earth. It can be arranged that in the background of this photograph there is evidence that it was taken before the spaceship turned around. How will observers on Earth explain this photograph?

Thanks in advance.
 
Janus said:
No such value as tMax exists. From Earth, the ship clock does slow down as it approaches c, but so does the rate at which the ship approaches c. There is no maximum value that the ship clock can read as seen from Earth.

Thanks, so that was my misunderstanding. If not too much trouble, what would be the formula to calculate ship clock value as seen from Earth, as a function of Earth clock value as seen on Earth, assuming a constant acceleration?
 
That would be:

t = \frac{c}{a}\sinh^{-1} \left( \frac{aT}{c} \right ) <br />

Where t is the shiptime
T is the time on Earth
and a is the acceleration.
sinh-1 is the inverse hyperbolic sin.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...

Similar threads

Back
Top