Acceleration due to Gravity: calculate initial velocity

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the initial velocity of a pole vaulter who travels 4.0 m up and then 4.0 m back down in 1.81 seconds, the correct approach involves understanding the total displacement and using kinematic equations. The initial calculation mistakenly used a total distance of 8 m instead of the relevant displacement of 4 m. The discussion emphasizes the importance of recognizing that the upward and downward journeys contribute to the overall time but not to the net displacement. By applying first principles and considering the peak speed and acceleration due to gravity, the initial velocity can be accurately determined. Ultimately, the correct interpretation of the problem is crucial for solving the physics question effectively.
Archedcutie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement

A Pole vaulter leaves the ground to travel 4.0 m up and over the bar, and then another 4.0 m back to the ground. It takes 1.81 s for the whole trip. Caculate the velocity with which she left the ground.


2. Homework Equations

Well the equation I used which I saw in my textbook was, v1[initial speed] = d-1/2[g][t]^2


3. The Attempt at a Solution

I subbed it in as v1= 8m- 1/2 [9.8N/kg][1.81s]^2
and I didn't get 8.8m/s [up] like the answer at the back of the textbook :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think 8m in the equation is wrong. How I read the problem is she travel up (y) 4 m, and then down 4 m, so the d = 4m. maybe that is it? I am not too sure, but maybe it's worth a try.
 
Hi,

if you forget 'THE equation' approach and think back to first principles.

The whole journey takes 1.81 s.

How long will the up part of the journey take?

The vaulter starts at a speed v, vertically.

At the peak of the vault what is their vertical speed?

now, you should be able to work it out as you have end speed, acceleration, distance and time!Cheers
 
on the aimslin22 front:

they travel up 4m and down 4m - so their overall displacement (Not distance) is...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top