Acceleration due to gravity problem.Help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration due to gravity on Mercury, given its mass of 3.30 x 10^23 kg and a diameter of 4878 km. The user correctly converts the diameter to radius in meters and applies the formula Gmp/rp², using the gravitational constant G = 6.67 x 10^-11. The calculated acceleration due to gravity is approximately 3.70 g, which is confirmed by another participant who appreciates the clarity of the solution. Additionally, a rough check suggests that the expected gravity should be about 40% of Earth's gravity, aligning with the calculated value. The problem is ultimately deemed solved.
NewtonJR.215
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Determine the acceleration due to gravity on the planet Mercury which has a mass of 3.30*10^23kg and a diameter of 4878 km.



Homework Equations


Gmp/rp2
Mp is mass of planet
Rp is radius of planet



The Attempt at a Solution


First off I needed to change the diameter into the radius. In my class I have to convert km to m.

4878 km*1000= 4,878,000 m

4,878,000/2= 2,439,000

2,439,000 is the radius

Next, plugged in.

G=6.67*10^-11

Gmp/rp2
(6.67*10^-11)(3.30*10^23)/2,439,000^2 = 3.70 g on Mercury.


I'm pretty sure this is correct just want to make sure. Thanks for looking it over!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

NewtonJR.215 said:
Gmp/rp2
(6.67*10^-11)(3.30*10^23)/2,439,000^2 = 3.70 g on Mercury.


I'm pretty sure this is correct just want to make sure. Thanks for looking it over!

Hi NewtonJR! Welcome to PF! :smile:

That's a very well-laid out solution … I can see exactly what you're doing!

Yes, that's fine … except I think you don't mean that "g" at the end, do you? :smile:

btw, as a check (which is often useful to make sure we're not 1000 out!), if we assume that Mercury's density is roughly the same as the Earth's, then mass is proportional to r³, so surface gravity is proportional to r, so should be about 40% of g, = about 4. Yippee! :biggrin:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi NewtonJR! Welcome to PF! :smile:

That's a very well-laid out solution … I can see exactly what you're doing!

Yes, that's fine … except I think you don't mean that "g" at the end, do you? :smile:

btw, as a check (which is often useful to make sure we're not 1000 out!), if we assume that Mercury's density is roughly the same as the Earth's, then mass is proportional to r³, so surface gravity is proportional to r, so should be about 40% of g, = about 4. Yippee! :biggrin:


Thanks for the welcome! Thanks for the feedback also. No, I didn't mean to put that "g" at the end.:cool:
 
This problem is SOLVED.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top