How much distance will be covered in the next second with constant acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
An object with constant acceleration travels 5 meters in the first second while starting from rest. The discussion revolves around calculating the additional distance covered in the second second, with some participants suggesting it could be 10 meters or 15 meters. The correct approach involves using kinematic equations to determine the final velocity at the end of the first second, which is 10 m/s, leading to an additional distance of 10 meters in the second second. Clarifications highlight that the initial velocity for the second second is not zero, impacting the calculations. Ultimately, the additional distance covered in the next second is confirmed to be 10 meters.
MIA6
Messages
231
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An object undergoes constant acceleration, initially at rest, then it travels 5 meters in the first second. What additional distance will be covered in the next second?

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it right that it covers 15 meters the next second? I think it should cover 10 meters the next second. Well, if I use kinematic equation to find out the acceleration, a=10m/s^2 when time lasts two seconds, but i think the question asks you the next second, so it lasts only 1 second,too despite it's the 2nd second, so I use my common sense, the acceleration for next second should be 5m/s^2, too. I got the additional distance is 10 meters. Which one is right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not telling! :wink: But the acceleration doesn't change. Apply that same kinematic equation twice: for t = 1 and for t = 2.
 
Doc Al said:
I'm not telling! :wink: But the acceleration doesn't change. Apply that same kinematic equation twice: for t = 1 and for t = 2.

I mean the question asks me for the additional distance in the next second. It's the 2nd second, but the time still lasts for one second. so I would choose to use t=1. If I use t=2, then a=10, but it is from time 0-2. It's different.
 
MIA6 said:
I mean the question asks me for the additional distance in the next second. It's the 2nd second, but the time still lasts for one second. so I would choose to use t=1. If I use t=2, then a=10, but it is from time 0-2. It's different.
If you are starting from the beginning, you'd use the distance from t = 1 to t = 2. But if you want to start counting 1 sec after the first 5 m, then don't forget that it is no longer starting from rest.

Maybe it would to clearer to answer these questions:
(1) Where is it after 1 second? (Answer is given: x = 5 m.)
(2) Where is it after 2 seconds?

Once you answer these you can see the additional distance it travel during that second second.
 
wait, how come two different formulas got two different results. a from the time 0-1, should be 5m/s^2, vf=vi+at, a=5 (I put vf=5 m/s), but for this formula d=vit+at^2/2, a=10? which one is right?
 
vf at t = 1 is not 5 m/s. 5 m/s is the average speed for the first second. vf at t = 1 is 10 m/s.
 
OHH. I was confused with the basic conception. Okay, I got it. Then, I think the additional distance is 10m not 15m. 15m is the total distance of 2 seconds. But question asks you ADDITIONAL DISTANCE, so I think is 10m (t=1, 1-2)
 
MIA6 said:
15m is the total distance of 2 seconds.
How did you determine this?
 
wait, I got 15 before was because I calculated the final speed vf=15, and then 1*15=15, it's wrong I think because average speed may not be 15. Then, a=10, d=vi+at^2/2 d=5+10*1/2=10m right?
 
  • #10
MIA6 said:
Then, a=10, d=vi+at^2/2 d=5+10*1/2=10m right?
If you are starting at the beginning of the second second (at t = 1), what's vi?

Why not start at the beginning (vi = 0) and just find out where this thing is at t=1 and t=2?
 
  • #11
ohh. vi=10 at the beginning of second second! 10+5 so it should be 15.
 
  • #12
MIA6 said:
ohh. vi=10 at the beginning of second second! 10+5 so it should be 15.
Good!

You could also have used: D = 1/2 a t^2 starting from t = 0

At t = 1; D = 1/2 a (1) = 5 m
At t = 2; D = 1/2 a (4) which means it must be 4 times further, or D = 20 m
 
  • #13
Yes, and then subtract them. Thank you.
 
Back
Top