Acceleration in an inertial reference frame

AI Thread Summary
An object's acceleration being zero in one inertial reference frame does not imply that its acceleration is zero in all other inertial reference frames, as acceleration can vary depending on the frame of reference. Similarly, if an object's velocity is zero in one inertial reference frame, it does not mean its velocity is zero in all other frames, since velocity is relative. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the definition and properties of inertial reference frames. It suggests consulting additional resources for a deeper understanding of these concepts. Overall, the relationship between acceleration and velocity in different inertial frames is complex and requires careful consideration.
Swag ranger
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


3. (a) If an object's acceleration is zero in one inertial reference frame then is its acceleration zero in all other inertial reference frames? (b) If an object's velocity is zero in one inertial reference frame then is its velocity zero in all other inertial reference frames?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I think it's going to be zero in both questions both I'm not so sure and I need an explanation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Swag ranger,

Welcome to Physics Forums.

What do you know about inertial reference frames? How are they defined?
 
gneill said:
Hi Swag ranger,

Welcome to Physics Forums.

What do you know about inertial reference frames? How are they defined?
An object that does not accelerate
 
Swag ranger said:
An object that does not accelerate
No, not quite. A reference frame is not necessarily associated with a particular object. It's a coordinate system that has particular properties (particularly with respect to other inertial reference frames).

Suggestion: Take a look at the Wikipedia article regarding Inertial Reference Frames:

Inertial frame of reference - Wikipedia
 

Thread 'Rolling without slipping on a curved surface'

Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
View full post »

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »

Similar threads

Kinetic energy in center of mass reference frame
Replies
3
Views
1K
Convert to Center of Mass Reference Frame
Replies
9
Views
1K
Position of particle in inertial reference frame
Replies
3
Views
2K
Calculate velocities in COM reference frame for 2D collision
Replies
27
Views
1K
Possible to use work-energy theorem from a non-inertial frame?
Replies
1
Views
2K
Acceleration acting on a block lying on a wedge (non-inertial frame)
Replies
3
Views
1K
Understanding meaning of inertial reference frames
Replies
2
Views
2K
Frame of reference (non inertial/inertial) in an Atwood Mach
Replies
13
Views
3K
Torque about an accelerating point
Replies
5
Views
3K
Calculate center of rotation of monocopter
Replies
17
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top