Acceleration of object - how much time does it take

  • Thread starter Thread starter lumtesm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Time
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the distance an object needs to reach 45 mph in 3.7 seconds, first determine the acceleration using the formula a = (v_f - v_i) / Δt. For 45 mph, which equals 66 ft/s, the acceleration is approximately 17.84 ft/s². Using the distance formula x = 0.5 * a * t², the distance required is about 122.1 feet. This calculation is relevant for racing go-karts and similar applications.
lumtesm
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hey

does anyone know how to calcuate the distance it would take for an object to reach 45mph starting from 0mph with a time limit of 3.7 seconds?

its not a homework question, i acctually race go karts and was curious if there was a way to calculate that

thanks for your help
Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lumtesm said:
hey

does anyone know how to calcuate the distance it would take for an object to reach 45mph starting from 0mph with a time limit of 3.7 seconds?

its not a homework question, i acctually race go karts and was curious if there was a way to calculate that

thanks for your help
Mike

EDIT OOPS! I was sure you had asked about the *acceleration*!
Once you have the acceleration, you may calculate the distance using
x_f = {1 \over 2} a_x t^2


Of course. The acceleration is simply {v_{x,f} - v_{x,i} \over \Delta t }.

You have to be careful with units. I am not sure what units people use quote acceleration of cars in the non-metric system, but it could be in mph/s (miles per hour per second) or miles per hour squared or miles per second squared. I have a hunch that the first would be the standard one (mph per second) in which case you would just divide 45 mph by 3.7 seconds. (In the metric system, it's of course given in m/s^2, meter per second squared).

Patrick
 
Last edited:
45 mph = 66 ft/s, use ft/s in the above formula.
Therefore, acc. = 66 ft/s / 3.7 s = 17.84 ft/s^2 = a.

So the distance, x, using the formula = 0.5 (17.84) (3.7)^2 = 122.1 feet.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top