Acceleration of system, connected to a rotational body

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of a system involving a disk, a cylinder, and a falling mass connected via a pulley. The user seeks to understand how a smart timer measured an acceleration of 0.4 cm/s² and requests the raw formulas behind this calculation. Responses emphasize the need to consider the moment of inertia of the rotating components and the effective rotational inertia of the falling mass. Additionally, the impact of frictional torque from the bearings must be accounted for in the calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of both experimental data and theoretical analysis in understanding the system's dynamics.
jason lee
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
< Mentor Note -- thread moved to HH from the technical physics forums, so no HH Template is shown >[/color]

I have a problem here.
what's the formula for the acceleration of a system wherein.
A disk with a cylinder on top of it with a shaft underneath to wound the thread to connect it with a pulley with a falling mass.
I already got the free body diagram of the falling mass. I have a problem in knowing the diagram for the left side.
we did this in the lab, which the smart timer for acceleration calculated it.
I want to know how did the smart timer get that acceleration through raw formulas. Thanks everyone! :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's say these are the given
M(disk) = 1415.4g
M(ring) = 1428.2g
R(disk) = 11.6cm
R1(ring) = 5.4cm
R2(ring) = 6.4cm
g = 980 cm/s^2
r(shaft) =1.2cm
m = 55g

The smart timer read the acceleration to be 0.4 cm/s^2
i need to get the raw formula for this reading thanks!
 
jason lee said:
< Mentor Note -- thread moved to HH from the technical physics forums, so no HH Template is shown >

I have a problem here.
what's the formula for the acceleration of a system wherein.
A disk with a cylinder on top of it with a shaft underneath to wound the thread to connect it with a pulley with a falling mass.
I already got the free body diagram of the falling mass. I have a problem in knowing the diagram for the left side.
we did this in the lab, which the smart timer for acceleration calculated it.
I want to know how did the smart timer get that acceleration through raw formulas. Thanks everyone! :D
Capture.PNG
 
jason lee said:
I want to know how did the smart timer get that acceleration through raw formulas.
What exactly is a 'smart timer'? I would have guessed it was physically measuring the movement and calculating the acceleration from that. Its 'formulas' would be based on samples of time and either speed or position.
But from the rest of your post I would have thought that what you wanted was a theoretical calculation of the acceleration based on the set-up. If so, please post an attempt at a solution.
 
You need to consider the (rotational) moi (moment of inertia) of all the rotating parts, and also express the falling mass also in terms of its effective rotational moi
The force driving the system, you get from the hanging mass.
Don't forget the frictional torque from the bearings.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
732
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
919
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K