Acceleration of Velocity Graph: Finding the Relationship | Worsley School

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustapha13
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on interpreting a velocity graph to determine acceleration. It is established that the acceleration is zero for the entire duration of the graph, as the velocity remains constant except for instantaneous changes at specific points. If there were non-zero acceleration, the graph would exhibit a slope, indicating changes in velocity over time. The conclusion confirms that the acceleration graph would indeed be a straight line along the t-axis, representing zero acceleration. This understanding clarifies the relationship between velocity and acceleration in the given context.
Mustapha13
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/average/graph1b.gif


Is the acceleration zero for this entire velocity graph?


Homework Equations



v = delta x/ delta t
a= delta v/ delta t

The Attempt at a Solution



If i were to convert this velocity graph to an acceleration graph, i think it would be a straight line on the t-axis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes, the velocity is constant all the time, it just changes instantaneously at t=3 and at t=6. If there were non-zero acceleration the velocity would change over time and you would see a slope (upwards or downwards) in a velocity versus time graph.
 
gerben said:
yes, the velocity is constant all the time, it just changes instantaneously at t=3 and at t=6. If there were non-zero acceleration the velocity would change over time and you would see a slope (upwards or downwards) in a velocity versus time graph.

thank you very much for the reply,

but just to make sure: so the acceleration graph of this velocity graph would be just a straight line on the t-axis ( 0 acceleration) ?
 
yes that's correct
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top