How to Calculate Acceleration for a Car Speeding from 10m/s to 15m/s in 80m"

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the acceleration needed for a car speeding from 10 m/s to 15 m/s over a distance of 80 m, the appropriate equation is vf² = vi² + 2ad, where vf is the final velocity, vi is the initial velocity, and d is the distance. The initial equations provided were not suitable since they assume an initial velocity of zero. The correct approach involves rearranging the equation to solve for acceleration (a). After substituting the known values, the acceleration can be determined. This method effectively addresses the problem of calculating acceleration in scenarios with non-zero initial velocities.
Oceanspire
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Poster has been reminded that they need to show some effort when posting schoolwork problems
1. What acceleration would be needed by a car speeding up from 10 m/s to 15 m/s in 80 m?2. The equations I have at my use right now are:
V = at
D = (1/2)(a)(t)^2
T = square root of 2D / A
A = change in velocity / time3. I honestly can't wrap my mind around how to solve this
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oceanspire said:
1. What acceleration would be needed by a car speeding up from 10 m/s to 15 m/s in 80 m?2. The equations I have at my use right now are:
V = at
D = (1/2)(a)(t)^2
T = square root of 2D / A
A = change in velocity / time
3. I honestly can't wrap my mind around how to solve this
Welcome to PF!

Your equations are valid when the initial velocity is zero. It is not the case in the problem.
 
Can't you use vf2 = vi2 + 2ad ?

You have vf, vi, d, and now you will have to find a.

:)
 
Last edited:
Antonius said:
Can't you use vf = vi + 2ad ?

You have vf, vi, d, and now you will have to find a.

:)
Don't you need to square those velocities ?
 
SammyS said:
Don't you need to square those velocities ?
SammyS said:
Don't you need to square those velocities ?

sorry
i edited it now (Y)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top