Acceleration with Velocity Problem.

AI Thread Summary
A boy runs at a constant velocity of 3.0 m/s east, while his father, starting from rest, accelerates at 1.5 m/s² to catch him. The initial calculation suggested it would take the father 2 seconds to reach the same speed as the son, but this does not account for the distance between them. To find the correct time for the father to catch up, equations for the distance traveled by both the father and son over time must be set equal, as they will be at the same distance when the father catches up. The correct answer is determined to be 4 seconds, highlighting the importance of considering both speed and distance in kinematic problems. Understanding the relationship between acceleration and distance is crucial for solving such motion problems accurately.
kencamarador
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
A boy is running a a constant velocity of 3.0 m/s [E] and passes his father who is standing still. The father immediately starts to chase his son with a constant acceleration of 1.5m/s at the instant his that his son reachers him

How long does it take the father to catch his son?

So to find time. I did

T= vf - vi/aav

Vf is final velocity (3.0-0)
Vi is initial velocity (0)
Aav is average velocity (1.5)

I got 2 Seconds? But the correct answer is 4? How?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You calculated the time it would take the father to reach the same speed as the son. But he will still be some way behind the son.
 
haruspex said:
You calculated the time it would take the father to reach the same speed as the son. But he will still be some way behind the son.

so what do I do though...
 
Write equations for how far each will travel in time t after the son passes the father.
 
at the instant his father catches his son, they all have the same distance from since the son passed his father, hence:
d_{father}=d_{son}

continue here
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top