Action and equations of motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept that adding a time derivative of a function of time and coordinates to the Lagrangian does not alter the equations of motion. The mathematical basis involves the action being modified by a term that integrates to zero at the endpoints, thus not affecting the variation. Participants explore the Euler-Lagrange equations to understand this principle better, emphasizing the importance of the chain rule in recognizing implicit and explicit time dependence. The conversation highlights that the addition of a perfect time derivative allows for transformations between different reference frames without changing the dynamics of the system. Overall, the integration of such terms leads to a consistent framework in classical mechanics.
TeTeC
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello !

I'm reading Landau/Lifchitz's mechanics book.

At equation (2.8), the author explains that when I add a time derivative of any function of time and coordinates f(q,t) to the lagrangian, the equations of motion are unchanged.

I understand the mathematical development leading to S' = S + f(q(2),t_2) + f(q(1),t_1), but I can't see why the equations of motion don't change.

I've tried to substitude the lagrangian of equation (2.8) in the Euler-Lagrange equations to convince myself it works, but that doesn't seem to be a good idea.

If you don't have this book and can't see what I'm talking about, I can provide you with more details.

Thank you !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
More details would certainly be appreciated :)
 
Okay L'=L+\frac{d}{dt}f(q,t). Compute the E-L equations for S' defined in terms of L'. Can you do it ?
 
action.jpg
(click on it, obviously my attachment becomes very small...)

Like this ? If this is correct, I don't see why the two last terms should disappear...
 
Perfect so far. Now who's

\frac{d}{dt}f(q(t),t) equal to ? HINT: Chain rule, you've got both implicit and explicit time dependence.
 
That simply imply that you can sit in a different frame of reference /coordinate and see the system.
But you can prove that simply,
When the perfect time derivative dF is added to Lagrangian, to calculate the action you have to integrate a perfect differential dF. Then you get a function F which is the functions of position and momentum coordinates and their variation vanishes at the end points. So the variation of the function F also vanishes.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top