Action and equations of motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept that adding a time derivative of a function of time and coordinates to the Lagrangian does not alter the equations of motion. The mathematical basis involves the action being modified by a term that integrates to zero at the endpoints, thus not affecting the variation. Participants explore the Euler-Lagrange equations to understand this principle better, emphasizing the importance of the chain rule in recognizing implicit and explicit time dependence. The conversation highlights that the addition of a perfect time derivative allows for transformations between different reference frames without changing the dynamics of the system. Overall, the integration of such terms leads to a consistent framework in classical mechanics.
TeTeC
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hello !

I'm reading Landau/Lifchitz's mechanics book.

At equation (2.8), the author explains that when I add a time derivative of any function of time and coordinates f(q,t) to the lagrangian, the equations of motion are unchanged.

I understand the mathematical development leading to S' = S + f(q(2),t_2) + f(q(1),t_1), but I can't see why the equations of motion don't change.

I've tried to substitude the lagrangian of equation (2.8) in the Euler-Lagrange equations to convince myself it works, but that doesn't seem to be a good idea.

If you don't have this book and can't see what I'm talking about, I can provide you with more details.

Thank you !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
More details would certainly be appreciated :)
 
Okay L'=L+\frac{d}{dt}f(q,t). Compute the E-L equations for S' defined in terms of L'. Can you do it ?
 
action.jpg
(click on it, obviously my attachment becomes very small...)

Like this ? If this is correct, I don't see why the two last terms should disappear...
 
Perfect so far. Now who's

\frac{d}{dt}f(q(t),t) equal to ? HINT: Chain rule, you've got both implicit and explicit time dependence.
 
That simply imply that you can sit in a different frame of reference /coordinate and see the system.
But you can prove that simply,
When the perfect time derivative dF is added to Lagrangian, to calculate the action you have to integrate a perfect differential dF. Then you get a function F which is the functions of position and momentum coordinates and their variation vanishes at the end points. So the variation of the function F also vanishes.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top