Actual Scenario Qualitative Wiring Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter michael650
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wiring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics homework question regarding the installation of electrical outlets, specifically why wiring is recommended to be wrapped three-quarters around the terminal post. Participants suggest that visualizing actual sockets and wiring could clarify the reasoning behind this guideline. The solid and substantial nature of the wire is emphasized, hinting at practical considerations in installation. Concerns about wrapping the wire more than once are raised, questioning potential implications for safety and functionality. Understanding these aspects is crucial for grasping the underlying principles of electrical wiring.
michael650
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
There is this one question on my physics homework that has been eluding me for quite a while. The problem itself is simple and is built upon common sense yet for some reason I can't wrap my head around it.

The problem reads that the installation instructions for connecting an outlet to the wiring of a house recommend that the wire be wrapped at least three-quarters of the way around the terminal post. It asks me to explain why someone would wrap it only three-quarters of the way around it, and I just can't find a reasonable answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
michael650 said:
There is this one question on my physics homework that has been eluding me for quite a while. The problem itself is simple and is built upon common sense yet for some reason I can't wrap my head around it.

The problem reads that the installation instructions for connecting an outlet to the wiring of a house recommend that the wire be wrapped at least three-quarters of the way around the terminal post. It asks me to explain why someone would wrap it only three-quarters of the way around it, and I just can't find a reasonable answer.

What would happen if you wrapped it more than once around?

It might help if you looked at actual sockets and wiring -- that would help you to visualize what is going on. The actual wire used is solid, and fairly big...

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&source=hp&q=electrical+socket+wiring&gbv=2&aq=f&aqi=g2&aql=&oq=

.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top