Adding a 3rd Source to a 2 Source Interference Pattern

AI Thread Summary
Inserting a third slit between two existing slits alters the interference pattern due to changes in path length differences. For points X and Z, the reasoning suggests that they do not correspond to maxima or minima due to phase differences among the sources. However, point Y is identified as experiencing constructive interference because the path lengths from the outer slits differ by two wavelengths while the middle slit is out of phase by one wavelength. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding phase relationships in determining interference outcomes. Overall, the addition of a third slit complicates the interference pattern, leading to a nuanced analysis of each point's behavior.
kosovo dave
Gold Member
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
http://imageshack.com/a/img834/5921/7iap.jpg

Homework Statement


Consider the double slit pattern shown above where the distance between slits is d. Each lettered point is labeled according to ΔD, the difference in distances from the slits to that point. ΔD is expressed in terms of wavelength, λ. Suppose that a third slit were inserted between the two slits such that the distance between adjacent slits becomes d/2. Would each point X,Y,Z be a max, min, or neither?

Homework Equations


ΔD=dsinΘ
ΔD=mλ constructive interference
ΔD=λ/n destructive interference, where n= # of slits
ΔD=mλ/n neither constructive nor destructive, where m=0,n,2n,3n,...

The Attempt at a Solution


At first I tried playing around with those equations but I ended up confusing myself. Then I realized that for a fringe to be a principal maximum, all of the light sources must be in phase there. At each point of constructive interference for two sources, S1 and S3 will still be in phase, but each will be out of phase with the new source S2 (halfway between S1 and S3). Similarly, S1 and S3 will interfere destructively at a point of destructive interference for two sources, but both will not be out of phase with S2. So I'm thinking none of the points will be max/min. Is my reasoning/answer correct?

Let me know if my amazing drawing/description are not clear enough and I will try to elaborate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Also, sorry for the image size. Is there a way to shrink it or would I have to reupload a smaller image?
 
I agree with your reasoning for points X & Z.

For point Y, the path lengths from S1 and S3 differ by __×λ. Therefore, each of those path lengths differs from the S2 path length by ___×λ.

If you fill in the blanks above, I think you will arrive at a different conclusion for point Y.

Hope that helps!

p.s. I have replaced the image in your original post with a link to it. Unfortunately, our forum software does not provide for resizing of images. You can upload a resized -- and cropped -- drawing if you wish. If you do, I could then edit your 1st post to include the reduced drawing. (A 640-pixels-or-less image width would definitely fit okay here.)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
It took me awhile to see what you were saying, but Y should have constructive interference right? Since S1 and S3 are separated by 2 wavelengths, S2 is out of phase by one wavelength with each.
 
Yes, correct. :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
799
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Back
Top