Adding a variable to a Lagrangian

  • Thread starter Thread starter MyoPhilosopher
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Variable
AI Thread Summary
Adding a constant velocity to the Lagrangian results in a Galilean boost, which transforms the coordinate system without affecting the equations of motion. The modified Lagrangian maintains the ratio of kinetic and potential energy, ensuring that the Euler-Lagrange equations remain invariant. This transformation demonstrates that the Lagrangian can be expressed in terms of kinetic and potential energy, reinforcing that it should have dimensions of energy rather than momentum. The discussion emphasizes that the addition of constant velocity does not alter the fundamental dynamics described by the Lagrangian. Overall, the equations of motion remain unchanged under this transformation.
MyoPhilosopher
Messages
41
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
$$ L = m\vec{\dot r}$$
Relevant Equations
-
Would the following: $$ L = m(\vec{\dot r + \vec v})$$ (constant velocity added to above eq.)
lead to equivalent euler-lagrange equations due to the fact that the ratio of T and V is unaffected by an increase in constant velocity?
And would this be an example of energy conservation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MyoPhilosopher said:
$$ L = m\vec{\dot r}$$
##L## should have dimensions of energy, not momentum.

##L## can be expressed in terms of ##T## and ##V##.
 
TSny said:
##L## should have dimensions of energy, not momentum.
Even more importantly, it should be a scalar and not a vector.
 
  • Like
Likes TSny
actually the Lagrange equations do not care even if you add
$$\frac{d}{dt}f(t,\boldsymbol r)=\frac{\partial f}{\partial t }+\Big(\frac{\partial f}{\partial \boldsymbol r},\boldsymbol{\dot r}\Big)$$
 
  • Like
Likes MyoPhilosopher
TSny said:
##L## should have dimensions of energy, not momentum.

##L## can be expressed in terms of ##T## and ##V##.
wrobel said:
actually the Lagrange equations do not care even if you add
$$\frac{d}{dt}f(t,\boldsymbol r)=\frac{\partial f}{\partial t }+\Big(\frac{\partial f}{\partial \boldsymbol r},\boldsymbol{\dot r}\Big)$$
What exactly does adding constant velocity do? Would is simply increase the r_dot vectors equally and therefore not affect the equations of motion?
 
TSny said:
##L## should have dimensions of energy, not momentum.

##L## can be expressed in terms of ##T## and ##V##.
I should have squared my second term, would this be appropriate $$ L = {m(\vec{\dot r + \vec v})}^2$$
 
MyoPhilosopher said:
What exactly does adding constant velocity do? Would is simply increase the r_dot vectors equally and therefore not affect the equations of motion?
Adding a constant velocity is effectively doing a Galilean boost, i.e., transforming to a coordinate system that moves at constant velocity relative to your original coordinate system.

The difference between the Lagrangians is ##m (\vec v \cdot \dot{\vec r} + v^2/2) = \frac d{dt}(\vec v \cdot \vec r + v^2 t/2)##. Thus, as per #4, the equations of motion are invariant under this transformation (which actually is the transformation ##\vec r \to \vec r + \vec v t##).
 
  • Like
Likes MyoPhilosopher and etotheipi
Orodruin said:
Adding a constant velocity is effectively doing a Galilean boost, i.e., transforming to a coordinate system that moves at constant velocity relative to your original coordinate system.

The difference between the Lagrangians is ##m (\vec v \cdot \dot{\vec r} + v^2/2) = \frac d{dt}(\vec v \cdot \vec r + v^2 t/2)##. Thus, as per #4, the equations of motion are invariant under this transformation (which actually is the transformation ##\vec r \to \vec r + \vec v t##).

Ahhh thank you that clarified it elegantly!
 
Back
Top