How Does the Sum of Alternating Series Lead to a Power Series for 2/(1-x^2)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving a power series for the function f(x) = 2/(1-x^2) centered at c = 0. The initial steps involve using partial fractions to express the function in a summable form, leading to the series representation of the sums of x^n and (-x)^n. The key realization is that the series simplifies to sum(1 + (-1)^n)x^n, which only contributes non-zero terms when n is even. This results in the final expression sum(2x^(2n)), confirming the even powers of x and their coefficients. Clarification is sought on the algebraic steps that lead to this conclusion, highlighting the need for clearer explanations in instructional materials.
kdinser
Messages
335
Reaction score
2
Find a power series for the function centered at c and determine the interval of convergence.
c = 0

f(x)=\frac{2}{1-x^2}

After some partial fractions work and getting the partials in the form of

\frac{a}{1-r}

I have

\sum x^n + \sum(-x)^n

if I factor out the x^n's I get

\sum(1+(-1)^n)x^n

This is where I'm stuck, the solution manual shows it then going to

\sum2x^{2n}

I've been staring at this thing for 15 mins and can't see how it's possible. Could someone give me a little push in the right direction with this? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
write out th efirst few terms and you will see the answer, n = 0, 1+1 = 2; n = 1, (1 + (-1))x = 0, etc...,
 
easy...

n has to be even so that the coefficient wouldn't be zero. Then you have 1+1 = 2 and the exponent is written as 2n to make sure it is even...



marlon
 
Thanks guys, I wish the book or the manual would make it a little clearer when they do stuff like this. The way it's written seems to imply that there's some algebra going on to get to the final result.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top