Adiabatic Equation Derivation Troubleshooting

  • Thread starter Thread starter MotoPayton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Adiabatic Tube
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a user struggling to derive the adiabatic equation correctly, resulting in answers that do not match the solution manual. Despite understanding the book's method, the user is unable to identify the discrepancies in their own approach after extensive effort. They seek assistance in pinpointing the mistake or suggestions to align their method with the book's solution. The urgency of the situation is emphasized by the user's inability to rest until the issue is resolved. Overall, the thread highlights a common challenge in mastering complex derivations in thermodynamics.
MotoPayton
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
I have been struggling to find my mistake for over 2 hours now and I still haven't exactly matched my answers with the books solution. I feel that my method should give the same answer the solution manual obtained however they are slightly off.

I understand the book method completely.

Can someone tell me why my method doesn't work or find a way to make it work. I won't be able to sleep until I know.

Thanks

Book Question:

Capture-2.jpg


Book Solution:

solution.jpg


My solution:

DSCN8328.jpg


Derivation of adiabatic equation to avoid confusion:

DSCN8329.jpg

 
Physics news on Phys.org
going to bump this once
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top