Programs Advisable/Possible to get a Master's in Physics during MedPhys PhD?

AI Thread Summary
Pursuing a Master's in physics or astrophysics concurrently with a PhD in medical physics is generally considered inadvisable due to the demanding nature of PhD coursework and research commitments. While some medical physics PhD students may take physics courses, the workload from research, exams, and clinical duties leaves little time for additional studies. The likelihood of securing a residency is significantly higher for medical physics PhD graduates compared to obtaining academic teaching positions, suggesting that focus should remain on research and clinical experience. Alternative career paths exist for those who do not secure a residency, including junior medical physicist roles and post-doctoral positions. Planning for contingencies is wise, especially given the competitiveness of CAMPEP residencies.
null geodesic
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
Is it advisable or possible to get a Master's in physics or astrophysics while doing a PhD in medical physics? I chose to pursue a medical physics PhD over physics. I love the rigorous coursework of physics, however, and my medical physics program is separate from the physics program and is strongly focused on medical physics as a standalone subject as opposed to a subfield of applied physics.

Has anyone heard of or know anyone that's done it concurrently? In your opinion, would it even be advisable if it can be done? I can always try to get it after my PhD, but if I can get it done during it it'd save a few years. The practical reason is so that I can be more competitive for CC level teaching/adjunct positions in case I have medical physics residency matching difficulties.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally I would say this is not advisable, if it is possible (which in most cases it probably is not).

Not sure about how your program is set up, but in my experience (which is with Canadian programs) medical physics PhD students will often take courses through the physics department, even if the PhD program doesn't technically fall under its umbrella. Sometimes it's mandatory. Sometimes, it's optional. In the latter case, if you're qualified and your committee is okay with it, you can take any course you're interested in. So you should be able to get in a few core physics courses regardless.

One issue that you'll run into though is that the didactic coursework tends to be rather demanding, just because of the sheer volume. On top of that, you've got your research project to worry about. And committee meetings, comprehensive exam, candidacy exam, conferences, papers, etc. And most PhD students will likely have some kind of clinical QA work as well. So that doesn't leave much time to seriously pursue something else academic.

And if not getting a residency is your primary motivation for considering this, it's important to bear in mind that the probability of getting a residency is a lot higher for a medical physics PhD than is the probability of obtaining an academic teaching position. So you'd be a lot better off putting that extra time into your research project, or gaining clinical experience. And even if you don't get the residency, you have other options. Lots of places still hire junior medical physicists (depending on where you are), there are post-doctoral research positions, positions with the major and minor vendors, radiation safety positions, etc.
 
Choppy said:
And if not getting a residency is your primary motivation for considering this, it's important to bear in mind that the probability of getting a residency is a lot higher for a medical physics PhD than is the probability of obtaining an academic teaching position. So you'd be a lot better off putting that extra time into your research project, or gaining clinical experience. And even if you don't get the residency, you have other options. Lots of places still hire junior medical physicists (depending on where you are), there are post-doctoral research positions, positions with the major and minor vendors, radiation safety positions, etc.

Ah, I did forget about vendors and post-docs. I know that CAMPEP residencies are pretty competitive, so I was developing contingency plans just in case. I'm starting the program this Fall so this is a bit premature, but developing those plans now is better than flailing around later.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top