Air pressure vessel safety valve size

AI Thread Summary
Determining the appropriate size of a safety valve for an air pressure vessel involves calculating the discharge area based on mass flow capacity, pressure, temperature, and other parameters as outlined in ASME and BS 5500. If the flow capacity is unknown, it raises questions about the relationship between the safety valve's discharge capacity and the compression unit's flow capacity. It is suggested that the mass flow out equals the mass flow in when only air is present, allowing even a small valve to reduce pressure if there is no mass flow in. Additionally, if the tank temperature rises, the volume flow out should equal the volume flow in. Understanding these relationships is crucial for ensuring safety in pressure vessel operations.
guideonl
Messages
58
Reaction score
6
Hi everyone,

I have to determine the size of safety valve for an air pressure vessel. I found in ASME and BS 5500 a procedure to calculate the size of safety valve, which relates the mass flow capacity to the: pressure, temprature, discharge area, s.v coefficient, and air parameters. This can be helpfull if the flow capacity is known, so you can get the discharge area (valve size). But if the flow capacity is unknown (such in case manufacturing perss. vessels without compression units).
The next question is there any relation between the discharge capacity of the s.v to the compression unit flow capacity? I suppose yes, but is it equal/higher? how much?

Thank you,
Guideon
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If it is all air, no liquid, then mass flow out = mass flow in. If there is zero mass flow in, then even a small valve is able to make the pressure start reducing immediately.

If temperature in the tank is increasing then use volume flow out = volume flow in.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top