Air Resistance of coffee filter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the upward force of air resistance on a single coffee filter and a stack of five filters as they fall from a height. The initial calculations for the single filter were correct, but the participant struggled with determining the fall time for the stack. It was clarified that the relationship between drag force and velocity can be linear or quadratic, with the latter being applicable for heavier objects. The participant initially assumed a linear relationship but later realized that a quadratic relationship was more appropriate, leading to the correct calculation of fall time by dividing by the square root of five. The conversation emphasizes understanding the dynamics of air resistance in relation to mass and velocity.
lebprince
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You drop a single coffee filter of mass 1.4 grams from a very tall building, and it takes 47 seconds to reach the ground. In a small fraction of that time the coffee filter reached terminal speed.

a) What was the upward force of the air resistance while the coffee filter was falling at terminal speed?

b) Next you drop a stack of 5 of these coffee filters. What was the upward force of the air resistance while this stack of coffee filter was falling at terminal speed?

c) Again assuming again that the stack reaches terminal speed very quickly, about how long will the stack of coffee filters take to hit the ground? (Hint: Consider the relation between speed and the force of air resistance.)


The Attempt at a Solution



i was able to get a and b right but part c am having problems with...Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The 'Hint' asks you to consider the relation between speed and the force of air resistance. What have you learned about this relationship between F_drag and v?
 
PhanthomJay said:
The 'Hint' asks you to consider the relation between speed and the force of air resistance. What have you learned about this relationship between F_drag and v?

with the instructor we have i haven't learned anything about the relationship between F drag and V...all my homework i have to dig my way out of it. I assume i should be using the formula F= k.v , so with the increase of V , F will increase. Thats about it
 
lebprince said:
with the instructor we have i haven't learned anything about the relationship between F drag and V...all my homework i have to dig my way out of it. I assume i should be using the formula F= k.v , so with the increase of V , F will increase. Thats about it
Well, that's all right, problem is, sometimes the force of air resistance varies linearly with the speed (F=kv,as you have noted, especially for small light objects or particles at low speeds), and sometimes the relationship is quadratic (F=kv^2, especially for heavier objects with higher speeds). You should have been given the relationship, or perhaps determined it from lab experiments. I believe the relationship betwen force and speed , for coffee filters, is quadratic.

In either case, let's assume the linear F=kv case for the 5 stacked filters. Since they weigh 5 times more than the single filter, and since you have detremined that the drag force at terminal velocity is 5 times greater than the drag force on the single filter, by how much would the terminal velocity increase? By how much would the time to fall decrease? What if F=kv^2, how would this change the results? (Note that k is a constant for the single or multiple filters cases, since k depends on shape, air density, and surface area exposed to the air, none of which change in either case).
 
Thanks for all ur help there...well since the drag force is 5 times more the 5 filters together i would assume that V would be increased by 5 and the time would decrease by 5 so if i would to divide 47 sec by 5 i would get 9.4s which is giving me a wrong answer.
 
hey buddy i figured it out...i think as you said its a quadratic so instead of dividing by 5 i divided by the sqrt of 5 and got the right answer thanks for all ur help.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top