Alcubierre metric and gravitational waves

gildomar
Messages
98
Reaction score
2
This may be a stupid question, but why can't the expansion/contraction of spacetime from a gravitational wave be used to create the areas of expansion/contraction required in the Alcubierre metric, instead of using regions of positive/negative energy density? I saw on the forums about the Alcubierre drive maybe producing gravitational waves as a consequence of it's operation, but not necessarily the other way around. Or has this already been addressed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you plug the Alcubierre metric into the Einstein field equations, you get a stress-energy tensor that violates various energy conditions (i.e., roughly speaking, negative mass-energy density is required).

If you want to propose some other metric with gravitational waves in it, then that will be some other metric, not the Alcubierre metric.
 
Thanks for posting - my question was, if gravity waves propagate at the speed of light, how does the expansion-contraction of the Alcubierre metric travel faster? It seems they are not consistent with each other.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top