Algebra Confusion: Proving (A+C)*(A'+B)*(B+C) = B*C

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Confusion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equation (A+C)*(A'+B)*(B+C) = B*C using Boolean algebra. The user expresses confusion over the steps taken to reach the conclusion and seeks clarification on the rules applied. Key points include the substitution of A*B = 0 and the relationship between A and B, where B is the complement of A. The explanation highlights that (A'+B) simplifies to B due to the properties of Boolean algebra, specifically idempotence and the relationship between A and B. The user concludes with a newfound understanding of the concepts involved in Boolean algebra.
zenity
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I've never done this type of Algebra... and it's a bit confusing. I've completed this question, but I don't know if I took the right steps...

*=AND, +=OR, '=NOT

If A*B = 0, A+B=1

Prove: (A+C)*(A'+B)*(B+C) = B*C

I expanded it a bit and applied some of the rules. Can someone explain it step by step? I got the answer but I'm a bit confused at how I got the answer.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(A+C)*(A'+B)*(B+C)
= (A+C)*(B+C)*(A'+B) (commutation)
= ((A*B)+C)*(A'+B) (distribution)
= (0+C)*(A'+B) (substitution A*B = 0)
= C*(A'+B)

Now I don't know what "rules" you know or how formal you have to be, but you should be able to see that (A'+B) = B given A+B = 1. Clearly, if A'+B = 0, then B = 0. If A'+B = 1, we want B to also necessarily be 1. But suppose it's not, so suppose A'+B=1 but B=0. Then A' = 1, which means A=0. So both A and B would be 0, but we're given A+B = 1, which is a contradiction, so B does indeed have to be 1 if (A'+B) is 1.
 
Mhm.. I understood all the steps until the last one...this is what I think...

Since AB = 0 and A+B=1

That leaves us with two choices for A or B. A can either be 0 or 1, and B must be the exact compliment.

Now we're stuck with C(A'+B). *Here's where I'm a bit confused*

If A is 0, B will be 1, then A' + B = 1
If A is 1, B will be 0, then A' + B = 0

From which of these two can we say C*(A'+B) = B*C?

in otherwords... how does (A'+B) = B?
 
Last edited:
Well I've already told you how (A' + B) = B. However, if you didn't follow the explanation, then consider what you said yourself:

A can either be 0 or 1, and B must be the exact compliment.

So B = A', right? So (A' + B) = B + B = B (Idempotence).
 
Ah... I think I understand what I just said. A'=B.. then you'd just have to sub it in.

Man, boolean algebra is mighty weird! I just started a week ago, still getting the hang of it. Thanks for your help!
 
how about a proof of A'=B

given A*B=0
(or with A')
A'+A*B=A'
(and with B)
A'*B + A*B*B=A'*B
=> (A'+A)*B=A'*B
=> B=A'*B (1)

given A+B=1
(and with A') => A'*A + A'*B = A'
=> A'*B = A'

(substitute from (1) ) => B=A'
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top