Algebraic Approach to Calculating Time for an Object to Fall from a Given Height

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldspice1212
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the time it takes for a book to fall from a height of 1.75 meters using the equation d = Vi(t) - 1/2at^2. The initial velocity is zero, which simplifies the equation significantly, allowing for easier calculations. Participants clarify the importance of defining positive and negative directions in the equation, which affects the signs of the terms. It is suggested that using the quadratic formula is appropriate when the initial velocity is not zero. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the algebraic approach to solving motion problems and the utility of substituting values to simplify calculations.
oldspice1212
Messages
149
Reaction score
2
Hey guys so I have a quick question about the algebra for a question like this.
I personally like to do the algebra first before I plug in the numbers so I have question for this one where it seems would be safer to plug in the numbers first?

So won't be to tough,

A book falls from a shelf that is 1.75m above the floor. How long will it take the book to reach the floor?

So we have initial velocity = 0
Displacement = 1.75m
Acceleration/ gravity = 9.81m/s
Time=?

Its obvious that we can use the formula d=Vi(t)-1/2at^2

So my question here is for the algebra if we plug the numbers in first it would be easier since we have initial velocity =0 so we can do (0)t=0. But if we didn't this is where I have trouble since I'm not the best at algebra, we'd get

Square root( (2d/g)) - Vi(t) = t which confuses me because of the initial velocity * Time? What would we have to do with the time there.

Thanks, I hope I didn't confuse anyone lol.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should end up with a quadratic equation which you solve accordingly.

Given your equation, d=Vi(t)-1/2at^2, you seem to be mixing up your coordinate directions. If the book is falling and you're taking the eventual displacement as positive (d = 1.75m), then your assumption is that "down" is positive. But then you write -1/2at2 which appears to assume that "up" is positive (given a positive value for acceleration).

So. Let's say that "up" is positive, and the floor is the zero reference. Then the initial displacement is d and the final displacement is 0. Then you can write:

##0 = d + v_it - \frac{1}{2}at^2## {where a is a positive constant, the magnitude of the acceleration}

There's your quadratic equation.

Alternatively, you could take the zero reference to be at the book's initial position on the shelf, and "down" to be positive. Then you might write:

##-d = 0 + v_it + \frac{1}{2}at^2##

In either case, if ##v_i## is zero then the quadratic becomes easy to solve...
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
If Vi ≠ 0, then you are dealing with a general quadratic equation in t. Use the quadratic formula to solve it. See here.

For a video review, try here.

[EDIT: I see gneill already provided an answer.]
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
oldspice1212 said:
Hey guys so I have a quick question about the algebra for a question like this.
I personally like to do the algebra first before I plug in the numbers so I have question for this one where it seems would be safer to plug in the numbers first?

So won't be to tough,

A book falls from a shelf that is 1.75m above the floor. How long will it take the book to reach the floor?

So we have initial velocity = 0
Displacement = 1.75m
Acceleration/ gravity = 9.81m/s
Time=?

Its obvious that we can use the formula d=Vi(t)-1/2at^2

So my question here is for the algebra if we plug the numbers in first it would be easier since we have initial velocity =0 so we can do (0)t=0. But if we didn't this is where I have trouble since I'm not the best at algebra, we'd get

Square root( (2d/g)) - Vi(t) = t which confuses me because of the initial velocity * Time? What would we have to do with the time there.

Thanks, I hope I didn't confuse anyone lol.
So, if the initial velocity is zero, you can just substitute Vi = 0 into your final equation and get the correct result. But seriously, for arbitrary initial velocity, if you want to solve it algebraically, it is best to follow the advice of the previous posters.
 
Ah quadratic formula, been ages since I've used that, thanks a lot guys, it helped :)!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top