Solving Algebraic Fractions with 3 Binomials

  • Thread starter Thread starter homegrown898
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fractions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving algebraic fractions involving three binomials. The user is unsure how to find a common denominator and whether to use FOIL for the binomials. It is suggested to multiply the first fraction by (x + 1) and the second by (x - 1)², while emphasizing not to multiply the denominators until the end. The importance of factoring out common terms after performing the subtraction is highlighted. Proper notation for writing fractions is also discussed, with recommendations for clarity.
homegrown898
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Since I can't write if a number is squared or anything I'll show you what I'm going to do. If X is squared I will just write x(x) That is what will represent squared. And since these are fractions I will use a slash to distinguish between the numerator and denominator.

x(x) / (x-1)(x-1) MINUS (x-1) / x+1

Where I'm having trouble is finding the common denominator. I know to find the common denominator I would need to multiply x+1 to the first fraction and multiple (x-1)(x-1) to the second fraction. But I don't know what to do when you have three binomials for common denominator.

Do I use FOIL with two of the binomials and then multiply the last binomial into that polynomial that I formed with FOIL?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's FOIL? You can just find the common denominator by, as you say, multiplying the first fraction by (x + 1) and the second by (x - 1)^2 (you can use ^n to write to the power n, btw). What do you mean you don't know what to do when there are 3 binomials in the denominator? Some things will cancel anyway.
 
Yes.

But, as a hint, don't multiply the binomials in the denominator until the end. You have to multiply the binomials in the numerator so you can do your subtraction, but after you factor your result, one of the binomials in the denominator will factor out.
 
When writing fractions, you should wrap the entire denominator in parentheses. e.g.

<br /> \frac{1}{x+1} = 1 / (x+1)<br />

or

<br /> \frac{1}{(x-1)(x+1)} = 1 / ((x-1) (x+1))<br />

x(x) is fine for squaring x. You could use the more succint notation xx too. But, as mentioned, x^2 is more common.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top