Algebraic manipulation of equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter jellicorse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manipulation
jellicorse
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was wondering whether anyone could tell me how to deal with this manipulation, which I am unable to see.

a_1=\frac{F}{(-m_1\omega^2+K_1+K_3)-K_3a_2}

a_2= \frac{K_3a_1}{(-m_2\omega^2 +K_2+K_3)}

Starting with a_1:

a_1=\frac{F}{(-m_1\omega^2+K_1+K_3)-\frac{K_3^2a_1}{(-m_2\omega^2 +K_2+K_3)}}

a_1(-m_2\omega^2 +K_2+K_3)=\frac{F(-m_2\omega^2 +K_2+K_3)}{(-m_1\omega^2+K_1+K_3)(-m_2\omega^2 +K_2+K_3) - K_3^2a_1}


The problem is I can't see how to eliminate a_1 from here... The result I need to get to is a_1=\frac{F(-m_2\omega^2 +K_2+K_3)}{(-m_1\omega^2+K_1+K_3)(-m_2\omega^2 +K_2+K_3) - K_3^2}

I know the steps are most likely simple and I'm missing something obvious but I can't see what it is that needs to be done (I'm a bit rusty, not having done any maths for a couple of months now)...

Any advice would be much appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try making a quadratic equation in 'a 1' and solve it as usual.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
OK, thanks for the tip, Adithyan...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top