Algebraic Physics to Calculus based

  • Thread starter Thread starter wraiine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus Physics
AI Thread Summary
Transitioning from algebra-based to calculus-based physics requires a fundamental shift in understanding, as algebra focuses on formula application while calculus emphasizes underlying principles. Resources that translate algebraic concepts into calculus may not be effective, as each approach serves different educational purposes. Both algebra and calculus are essential for mastering higher-level physics, with calculus providing deeper insights and interpretations. Techniques like the Laplace transform can simplify calculus problems into algebraic ones, but attempting to reverse this process is discouraged. Ultimately, familiarity with both mathematical frameworks is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of physics.
wraiine
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm taking university physics now, calculus based. I took algebraic physics in high school and did really well. But algebra is easy. Calculus can be confusing and what I'm looking for a site or a book that can help me translate algebraic physics into calculus. Does anybody know of any good sources?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can pretty much guarantee that the strategy "translate algebraic physics into calculus" will not work. They really have to be approached differently - algebra-based is much more "pick this formula for that problem" and calculus-based is much more "understand the underlying principles". Trying to fit one square peg into the other round hole is unlikely to work well.
 
Then calculus based physics requires a deeper understanding of fundamental physics than algebraic does?
 
Hm, Heisenberg and Schrödinger each developped their own quantum theory: the former using algebra, the latter using calculus. In the end it was proven both were mathematically equivalent. So I don't think one implies a deeper understanding that the other. I suppose the calculus is easier for interpretation, but that might also be a downside :o
 
You will find that both university algebra ( groups, rings, modules, linear algebra and so on) and university calculus are developed a long way beyond their high school counterparts.

To effectively study physics at higher level you will need both. There is some unifying theory as well, which helps when you have covered enough to draw it all together. In the beginning there is a huge amount of what seems like disparate material, but when you become more familiar you will see that there are many unifying threads and principles.

You will also find that, since algebra is inherently easier (or at least less laborious) than calculus, there are techniques, such as the Laplace transform, to reduce calculus questions to algebra ones. This is the opposite direction from your question. As Vanadium has said it is not recommended to try to go the other way.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
60
Views
6K
Back
Top