Alice, Bob and Charge falling into Black Hole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Alice and Bob, positioned at equal distances from a non-rotating black hole, measure differing electromagnetic field intensities when Bob drops a charged body into the black hole. The discussion concludes that their measurements will never equalize in finite time due to the slow propagation of changes in the electromagnetic field from the event horizon. Additionally, when observing a neutron star with a non-symmetric charge distribution that collapses, Alice and Bob will continue to measure different electromagnetic field values. This is supported by the no-hair theorems and the Penrose-Hawking singularity theorems, which emphasize the limitations of static solutions and the experience of infalling observers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black hole physics, specifically non-rotating black holes
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic field theory and its interaction with gravitational fields
  • Knowledge of the no-hair theorem and its implications in general relativity
  • Comprehension of the Penrose-Hawking singularity theorems and geodesic incompleteness
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the no-hair theorem in black hole physics
  • Explore the effects of electromagnetic radiation in gravitational fields
  • Investigate the Penrose-Hawking singularity theorems in detail
  • Read "Black Holes and Time Warps" by Kip Thorne, focusing on chapters 6 and 7
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, astrophysicists, and students studying general relativity, particularly those interested in black hole dynamics and electromagnetic interactions in extreme gravitational fields.

Dmitry67
Messages
2,564
Reaction score
1
Alice and Bob are hovering at say 10Rs at opposite sides of the non-rotarting black hole. Bob drops charged body and it is free falling into black hole (again, at opposite side from Alice). They both measure the intensity of electromagnetc field. Initially, of course, intensity at Bobs location is much higher.

Question: do Alice and Bobs measurements become equal in finite time (as Black Hole does not have hair and it can't have any non-symemtric charge distribution), or, as for Bob and Alce object 'freezes' at the event horizon, Bob measures slightly more intensive EM field forever?

My bet is they never become equal: even body reaches the singularity and situation becomes symmetric, the change in EM field propagates from EH very slowly.

Now slightly different situation: Bob and Alice observe neutron star with non-symmetric charge distribution, where the unbalanced charge is already below future horizon. Now star suddenly collapses. I conclude that Bob and Alice wll still measure different values. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a good discussion of the kind of issue you're talking about in ch. 6 and 7 of Black Holes and Time Warps, by Kip Thorne.

I don't think the nonzero charge on the object really changes the answer to your question. With an uncharged object, we get all the same issues, but there is only gravitational radiation, not gravitational+EM.

The various no-hair theorems are all theorems about static solutions. They don't have anything to say about the process of collapse.

The Penrose-Hawking singularity theorems prove geodesic incompleteness, i.e., they only talk about the experience of an infalling observer, not about how the process appears from the outside.

In your example, I believe what happens is that gravitational and electromagnetic radiation very quickly remove the nonuniformity produced by the charged object that Bob drops in. Bob has only added a finite amount of mass-energy to the system, so radiation can only carry away a finite amount of energy. As the object approaches the horizon, its radiation (both electromagnetic and gravitational) becomes infinitely weak and redshifted. To a distant observer, the externally observable fields converge asymptotically to those of a static black hole.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K