All Eigenvalues Lie on the Unit Circle

ali987
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

Consider a 2x2 partitioned matrix as follow:

A = [ B1 B2 ; B3 B4 ]

I'm sure that all eigenvalues of A are on the unit circle (i.e., abs
(all eig) = 1 ). but, I don't know how to prove it. Is there any
theorem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it, by chance, a unitary matrix: AA^\dag=I?
 
\begin{pmatrix}2 & 0\\ 0 & 1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ 0\end{pmatrix}=2\begin{pmatrix}1\\ 0\end{pmatrix}
 
ali987 said:
Hi everyone

Consider a 2x2 partitioned matrix as follow:

A = [ B1 B2 ; B3 B4 ]

I'm sure that all eigenvalues of A are on the unit circle (i.e., abs
(all eig) = 1 ). but, I don't know how to prove it. Is there any
theorem?
You can't prove it- it's not true! Fredrik gave an example in which the eigenvalue is 2, not on the unit circle.

Now, is there some condition on A, such as AA^\dag=I, as arkajad suggests, that you haven't told us?
 
Unfortunately, there is no special condition on A.
B1, B2, B3 and B4 are constructed from several matrices themselves, some of those matrices are symmetric and positive definite.
Is there any theorem which relate orthogonality of the A to orthogonality (or sth like that) of B1...B4?
 
ali987 said:
Is there any theorem which relate orthogonality of the A to orthogonality (or sth like that) of B1...B4?

No. What is important are the interrelations of your block matrices. Write AA^\dag in the block matrix form and you will see. Is your matrix normal: AA^\dag=A^\dag A? If you do not know even this - then what do you know about your B matrices and relations between them? The key to your question is there.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top