Allowed and Forbidden Electron-Photon Reactions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vrbic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on demonstrating that the conservation of 4-momentum prohibits the absorption of a photon by an electron, expressed as e + γ → e. Participants analyze this using spacetime diagrams and frame-independent calculations, emphasizing the importance of both momentum and energy conservation. A key point raised is that if an electron at rest absorbs a photon, it leads to a negative energy scenario, which is physically impossible. The conversation also notes that considering the time-reversed process of an electron emitting a photon further clarifies the impossibility of the initial reaction. Overall, the analysis confirms that such a photon-electron interaction cannot occur under the laws of physics.
Vrbic
Messages
400
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


Show, using spacetime diagrams and also using frame-independent calculations, that the law of conservation of 4-momentum forbids a photon to be absorbed by an electron, e + γ → e.

Homework Equations


##\textbf{p}_{e1}+\textbf{p}_{\gamma}=\textbf{p}_{e2}## : ##(E_1,\vec{p_1})+(E_{\gamma},E_{\gamma}\vec{n})=(E,\vec{p_2})##,
where ##\textbf{p}## is 4-vector, ##\vec{p}## is ordinary 3-vector and ##\vec{n}## is unit vector in photon's direction.
##E=\sqrt{p^2+m^2}##

The Attempt at a Solution


I take only 3-vecotrs and I (I hope I may) suppose ##\vec{p_1}=0## i.e. is in rest.
##\vec{0}+E_{\gamma}\vec{n}=p_2\vec{n}=>\sqrt{E^2-m^2}=E_{\gamma}##
First time I put there ##E=\frac{1}{2}mv^2## but I feel it is not good probably. Is my beginning right? What should I use or think about?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You used conservation of momentum so far.
What about conservation of energy?

The problem is easier in the reference frame of the electron in the final state.
 
mfb said:
You used conservation of momentum so far.
What about conservation of energy?

The problem is easier in the reference frame of the electron in the final state.
Ok, ##(\gamma m, \vec{p}) + (E_{\gamma},E_{\gamma}\vec{n})=(m,\vec{0})##. Right? From energy part than we have ##E_{\gamma}=m(1-\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2}})<0##. And it is this problem, negative photon's energy?
 
Right.

Time-reversed, the process would be an electron at rest emitting a photon and gaining kinetic energy at the same time. Written like that, it should be clear that it cannot happen.
 
  • Like
Likes Vrbic
mfb said:
Right.

Time-reversed, the process would be an electron at rest emitting a photon and gaining kinetic energy at the same time. Written like that, it should be clear that it cannot happen.
Thank you.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top