Allowed Reactions: Process 1-5 Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter genloz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactions
genloz
Messages
72
Reaction score
1
I would really just like to know if I'm on the right track here in terms of if reactions can go ahead or not... The reactions are in latex and my thoughts are below each one..

Homework Statement


For each of the following processes say whether it is a strong, electromagnetic or weak process or whether it is forbidden in the standard model and explain the reasons.

Process 1
K^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}+e^{-}
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - not conserved
Baryon Number - no baryons
Spin - (-1/3)(1/3) -> (2/3)(1/3) + (1/2) not conserved
Strangeness - not conserved
Therefore not possible
It would have been a weak interaction though?

Process 2
e^{-}+p \rightarrow n+\upsilon_{\mu} (the final thing should be a muon neutrino)
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - not conserved
Baryon Number - conserved
Spin - (1/2) + (1/2) -> (1/2) + (0) not conserved
Strangeness - conserved
Therefore not possible
It would have been a weak interaction though?

Process 3
\Delta^{0} \rightarrow \pi^{+}+n
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - no leptons
Baryon Number - conserved
Spin - ? -> 0 + (1/2) no idea
Strangeness - conserved
Therefore possible? (dependent on spin)
It would be a weak interaction

Process 4
K^{0} + n \rightarrow \Lambda + \pi^{0}
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - no leptons
Baryon Number - ?
Spin - ?
Strangeness - not conserved (s in the K, anti-s in the lambda)
Therefore possible? (dependent on spin & baryon number)
It would be a weak interaction

Process 5
\Xi^{0} \rightarrow \Lambda + \pi^{0}
Charge conserved
Mass conserved
Lepton Number - no leptons
Baryon Number - ?
Spin - ?
Strangeness - not conserved (ss in the Xi, s in the lambda)
Therefore possible? (dependent on spin)
It would be a weak interaction


Also, In what situation would it be a strong interaction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I think processes 3,4 and 5 are strong interactions rather than weak...
 
Okay, process 3 also isn't possible due to the delta having spin 3/2, the pion having spin 0 and the neutron having spin 1/2 so this is also impossible due to spin not being conserved?

Process 4
Baryon Number 0 + 1 -> 1 + 0, conserved
Spin 0 + 1/2 -> 1/2 + 0, conserved
So process 4 is possible...

Process 5
Baryon Number 1 -> 1 + 0 conserved
Spin - can't find out the spin for Xi, -> 1/2 + 0
So it's not possible due to lack of strangeness conservation and possibly spin but unsure on this point??

Please let me know if I'm on the right track here!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top