Alternative to Kleppner & kolenkow problems

  • Context: Classical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gstroot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kleppner
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around seeking alternative resources for introductory physics problems that are perceived as less challenging than those found in Kleppner & Kolenkow's "An Introduction to Mechanics." Participants are exploring various textbooks and resources that could provide a more accessible problem set for someone who finds K&K difficult.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests looking into calculus-based introductory physics books such as Halliday/Resnick/Walker and Young/Freedman as alternatives to K&K.
  • Another participant recommends starting with problems from Resnick and Halliday to gradually transition to the more difficult problems in Kleppner.
  • A participant mentions David Morin's "Classical Mechanics" as a potential source of problems, although they express that Morin's problems can be tricky and may not be helpful for everyone.
  • There is a suggestion to consider Taylor's book, with one participant noting that they found Taylor's explanations helpful, while another argues that Taylor's book should be approached after K&K.
  • One participant reflects on their own background in mathematics, suggesting that their familiarity with math may have influenced their perception of the difficulty of Taylor compared to K&K.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the accessibility and helpfulness of various alternative textbooks. There is no consensus on which resource is definitively easier or more suitable for the original poster's needs.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note their personal experiences with the difficulty of physics problems, which may depend on individual mathematical backgrounds and learning preferences. The discussion includes subjective assessments of various textbooks without resolving which is the best alternative.

gstroot
Messages
26
Reaction score
1
Hey all,

I'm loving an Introduction to Mechanics, but I'm finding the problems in the book are quite hard. Is there another book I could do for intro problems?

I'd still like to do the problems in an introduction to mechanics, but I need some easier problems as a base
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The next step "down" from K&K is occupied by lots of calculus-based intro physics books: Halliday/Resnick/Walker, Young/Freedman, etc. Maybe also French's "Newtonian Mechanics", although I think that might be more like K&K.
 
Try doing the problems from Resnick and Halliday first. The difficult quotations m questions in this book will lead you to the harder ones in Kleppner more gradually.
 
Aniruddha@94 said:
Try doing the problems from Resnick and Halliday first. The difficult quotations m questions in this book will lead you to the harder ones in Kleppner more gradually.
Just the answer I was looking for. Thanks for the advice and hopefully I can get everything figured out. Klepner is hard but invigorating when you finally understand it.

Cheers!
 
I was never very good at Physics and found their problems quite inaccessible, even though I'm good at Maths. But, a similar source of problems is David Morin's book about Classical Mechanics. Check it out.
 
Maybe Try Taylors book? I liked how he beat the explanations to death.
 
Maths Absorber said:
I was never very good at Physics and found their problems quite inaccessible, even though I'm good at Maths. But, a similar source of problems is David Morin's book about Classical Mechanics. Check it out.

Morin's problems are annoying, and depend on trickery to solve more often than not. I doubt this will help him.

MidgetDwarf said:
Maybe Try Taylors book? I liked how he beat the explanations to death.

I wouldn't do that, Taylor is where you should go after K&K.
 
Student100 said:
Morin's problems are annoying, and depend on trickery to solve more often than not. I doubt this will help him.
I wouldn't do that, Taylor is where you should go after K&K.

I can see that. Maybe I found Taylor easier than K&K because I had the math background. I had already completed 3 semesters of Calculus , 2 books on Linear Algebra, Discrete Math, and completed Geometry by Moise. But I did like the extra explanations Taylor provided and I felt that K&K could have maybe explained some topics a bit more.

Upon pointing this out, I may retract my statement. I am a Math major and not a physics major. So excuse my bad suggestion OP.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
21K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K