Am I doing this right? - rotational motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating how far a wheel rolls uphill before stopping, using energy conservation principles. The wheel's initial kinetic energy, derived from its angular speed, is equated to the gravitational potential energy at its highest point. The participant plans to substitute the relationship between linear and angular velocity to solve for height and then use trigonometry to find the distance rolled. Confirmation of the approach indicates that it is correct, despite initial mistakes in variable cancellation. The final answer is obtained by correctly plugging in values after revising the method.
hoseA
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hint: Consider the wheel's energy.
Consider a wheel of radius 1.23 m, mass
7.7 kg and moment of inertia I =1/2 MR^2
(it's a solid disk). The wheel rolls without
slipping in a straight line in an uphill direction 30 degrees above the horizontal. The wheel starts at angular speed 16.1 rad/s but the ro-
tation slows down as the wheel rolls uphill,
and eventually the wheel comes to a stop and
rolls back downhill.
The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2
How far does the wheel roll in the uphill
direction before it stops? Answer in units of
m.

This is what I plan to do:

1. Use:

1/2 Iw^2 +1/2 mv^2 = mgh

by substituting Rw for v and solving for h.

2. "h" would equal the "y" component so I would then go on to use trig. to find the hypontenuse.

Would that work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yes, it is correct
 
Thanks for the confirmation. I don't think I'm good at canceling variables out as I got the wrong answer the first time (tried to cancel out the masses). But the second time around I just plugged in everything and it came out to a different and correct answer. :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top