How can I find the distance a car travels when the brakes are applied?

  • Thread starter BuBbLeS01
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Track
In summary: You are doing it wrong... you should use m/s for velocity and m/s^2 for acceleration (because your force equation requires kg for mass and m/s^2 for acceleration... to get the result in N)... and also 12000.0N isn't the mass, it's the weight... get the mass of the object.In summary, a car that weighs 12000.0 N is initially moving at a speed of 57.0 km/hr when the brakes are applied and the car is brought to a stop in 2.6 s. The magnitude of the force that stops the car is -7455.26 N.
  • #1
BuBbLeS01
602
0
Question:
A. A car that weighs 12000.0 N is initially moving at a speed of 57.0 km/hr when the brakes are applied and the car is brought to a stop in 2.6 s. Find the magnitude of the force that stops the car, assuming it is constant.

B. What distance does the car move during this time?

Okay so I drew the diagram and I am planning on using the f=ma equation but I think I need to solve for a first using Vf=Vo + at. Am I on the right track or am I completely off??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, you're on the right track.
 
  • #3
Okay so I did...
(57 km/hr)^2 = a x (2.6s)
and I got 1249.6 m/s^2...which way wrong...where am I going wrong?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Wait I wrote that backwards sorry...

I got...

0 = (57 km/hr)^2 +a(2.6s)
 
  • #5
BuBbLeS01 said:
Wait I wrote that backwards sorry...

I got...

0 = (57 km/hr)^2 +a(2.6s)

Why are you squaring 57?
 
  • #6
Why are you squaring the velocity? And you've got to be consistent with your units...you can't have seconds on one side of the equation and hours on the other without introducing a conversion factor.
 
  • #7
oh my gosh I don't know why I am squaring it...I am looking at the wrong equation. Okay I changed 57 km/hr to 0.01583 km/s. Now I have...
0 = 0.01583 km/s + a (2.6s)...
(-0.01583 km/s) / (2.6s) = a

so now I can use f=ma
f= (12000.0 N) x (0.0060897 km/s^2)
 
  • #8
BuBbLeS01 said:
oh my gosh I don't know why I am squaring it...I am looking at the wrong equation. Okay I changed 57 km/hr to 0.01583 km/s. Now I have...
0 = 0.01583 km/s + a (2.6s)...
(-0.01583 km/s) / (2.6s) = a

so now I can use f=ma
f= (12000.0 N) x (0.0060897 km/s^2)

careful... you should use m/s for velocity and m/s^2 for acceleration (because your force equation requires kg for mass and m/s^2 for acceleration... to get the result in N)...

and also 12000.0N isn't the mass, it's the weight... get the mass of the object.
 
  • #9
learningphysics said:
careful... you should use m/s for velocity and m/s^2 for acceleration (because your force equation requires kg for mass and m/s^2 for acceleration... to get the result in N)...

and also 12000.0N isn't the mass, it's the weight... get the mass of the object.
okay so this is what I have now...

0=15.83 m/s + a x (2.6s)
(-15.83m/s) / (2.6s) = a = (-6.08846)

w=mg
12000/9.8=1224.49

f=ma
1224.49 * -6.08846 = -7455.26 N
That is really big!
 
  • #10
BuBbLeS01 said:
okay so this is what I have now...

0=15.83 m/s + a x (2.6s)
(-15.83m/s) / (2.6s) = a = (-6.08846)

w=mg
12000/9.8=1224.49

f=ma
1224.49 * -6.08846 = -7455.26 N
That is really big!

Looks good. That's the right answer.
 
  • #11
learningphysics said:
Looks good. That's the right answer.
It says its incorrect...I don't know what is wrong.
 
  • #12
BuBbLeS01 said:
It says its incorrect...I don't know what is wrong.

I don't think you carried enough decimal places... I get -7456.8N
 
  • #13
learningphysics said:
I don't think you carried enough decimal places... I get -7456.8N
should I be entering it as positive since its the magnitude?
 
  • #14
BuBbLeS01 said:
should I be entering it as positive since its the magnitude?

Yes! I didn't notice that it asked for magnitude!
 
  • #15
learningphysics said:
Yes! I didn't notice that it asked for magnitude!
Yay it's right! Hehe...Thank you so much for your time! I really do appreciate it!
 
  • #16
BuBbLeS01 said:
Yay it's right! Hehe...Thank you so much for your time! I really do appreciate it!

no prob.
 
  • #17
How do I start the second part of this question?
 
  • #18
Hey,

If I remember right I believe you should use the displacement function,

[tex]
{x}(t) = {x}_{0} + {v}_{x_{0}}{t} + \frac{1}{2}{a}_{x}{t}^{2}
[/tex]

I think that should work.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
  • #19
Thats what I used but it says incorrect?
I put...

Xt = 0 + (57 km/hr) x (2.6s) + (1/2)(21.9km/s^2)(2.6s^2)
 
  • #20
BuBbLeS01 said:
Thats what I used but it says incorrect?
I put...

Xt = 0 + (57 km/hr) x (2.6s) + (1/2)(21.9km/s^2)(2.6s^2)

don't mix up your units... do everything in m, s, m/s, m/s^2
 
  • #21
For the acceleration I have a formula of (Vf-Vo)/t...that doesn't seem right...is it?
 
  • #22
BuBbLeS01 said:
For the acceleration I have a formula of (Vf-Vo)/t...that doesn't seem right...is it?

It is right, but you need to use the right units... you can't use km/hr then use seconds for time... use m/s for velocity... convert the velocity to m/s.

units must be consistent.
 
  • #23
Oops! here we go..

Xt = 0 + (15.83 m/s) x (2.6s) + (1/2)(7.92m/s^2)(2.6s^2)

and its still saying my answer is wrong :(
 
  • #24
BuBbLeS01 said:
Oops! here we go..

Xt = 0 + (15.83 m/s) x (2.6s) + (1/2)(7.92m/s^2)(2.6s^2)

and its still saying my answer is wrong :(

where are you getting the 7.92? 7.92 is not 15.83/2.6. Also acceleration is negative.
 
  • #25
Oh my gosh I divided by 2 instead of 2.6! My answer is still wrong though. I got 33.24 mXt = 0 + (15.83 m/s) x (2.6s) + (1/2)(-6.088m/s^2)(2.6s^2)
 
  • #26
BuBbLeS01 said:
Oh my gosh I divided by 2 instead of 2.6! My answer is still wrong though. I got 33.24 m


Xt = 0 + (15.83 m/s) x (2.6s) + (1/2)(-6.088m/s^2)(2.6s^2)

you didn't do (2.6)^2... it's (1/2)at^2...

There's another formula you can also use to get the distance... it doesn't have acceleration in it. Check your answer both ways and compare them...
 

1. What does it mean to be on the right track in science?

Being on the right track in science means that your research or experiments are following the scientific method, your results are supported by evidence, and your conclusions are logical and based on your findings.

2. How do I know if I am on the right track with my research?

You can determine if you are on the right track by regularly reviewing your methodology, data, and conclusions with your peers and making adjustments based on their feedback. Additionally, your research should align with established scientific principles and theories.

3. What should I do if I am unsure if I am on the right track?

If you are unsure if you are on the right track, it is best to seek guidance from your colleagues or a mentor. They can provide valuable insights and help you identify any potential flaws in your research.

4. Can I still be on the right track if my results do not support my hypothesis?

Yes, it is possible to still be on the right track even if your results do not support your initial hypothesis. In science, unexpected results can often lead to new discoveries and a deeper understanding of the topic being studied.

5. How do I ensure that I stay on the right track throughout my research?

To stay on the right track throughout your research, it is important to regularly review and analyze your data, seek feedback from your peers, and stay up to date on relevant scientific literature. It is also important to remain open-minded and adaptable to new information and potential changes in your research direction.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top