Automotive Amplitude based frequency response simulation in Abaqus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on setting up an amplitude-based frequency response simulation in Abaqus, specifically for a scenario where a displacement of 0.2 mm at a concerned frequency of 100 Hz is applied. It is established that nonzero displacements cannot be directly prescribed as boundary conditions in mode-based dynamic response procedures in Abaqus. Instead, users must utilize base motion boundary conditions or apply forces to achieve the desired simulation results. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding these limitations when configuring analyses in Abaqus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Abaqus software and its simulation capabilities
  • Understanding of dynamic response procedures in finite element analysis
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions and their implications in simulations
  • Basic principles of frequency response analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Abaqus documentation on mode-based dynamic response procedures
  • Learn how to apply base motion boundary conditions in Abaqus
  • Explore the implementation of force applications in frequency response simulations
  • Investigate examples of amplitude-based frequency response analyses in Abaqus
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and analysts working with finite element simulations in Abaqus, particularly those focused on dynamic response analysis and frequency response evaluations.

Sam George
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Enforce displacement in Frequency Response Simulation
Hi,

I have inputs like displacement of a driving mechanism and then the frequency of concern .

Displacement: 0.2 mm
Concerned Frequency: 100 Hz


I would like to evaluate a part with the input displacement applied to a node and not as base excitation.
It can be sweep over the frequency range 0-200Hz

How do we set it up in Abaqus, can we give amplitude in steps over the frequency range?

Please guide me with a link or syntax on how to proceed with the analysis setup.

Regards,
Sam George
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Here’s a quote from Abaqus documentation (chapter about SSD analyses):

It is not possible to prescribe nonzero displacements and rotations directly as boundary conditions in mode-based dynamic response procedures. Therefore, in a mode-based steady-state dynamic analysis, the motion of nodes can be specified only as base motion; nonzero displacement or acceleration history definitions given as boundary conditions are ignored, and any changes in the support conditions from the eigenfrequency extraction step are flagged as errors.

So you have to either use a base motion BC or apply a force instead.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes Sam George and berkeman
FEAnalyst said:
Here’s a quote from Abaqus documentation (chapter about SSD analyses):

It is not possible to prescribe nonzero displacements and rotations directly as boundary conditions in mode-based dynamic response procedures. Therefore, in a mode-based steady-state dynamic analysis, the motion of nodes can be specified only as base motion; nonzero displacement or acceleration history definitions given as boundary conditions are ignored, and any changes in the support conditions from the eigenfrequency extraction step are flagged as errors.

So you have to either use a base motion BC or apply a force instead.
Thanks for the reply, I think I will have go with using Force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K