An electric dipole consists of a pair of equal but opposite charges

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the electric potential created by an electric dipole consisting of two equal but opposite charges, +Q and -Q, separated by a distance d. The original poster seeks to understand why the electric potential at the midpoint between these charges is calculated to be zero, despite the expectation that a negative charge placed at this point would experience forces due to the nearby charges.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between electric potential and potential energy, questioning the implications of a zero potential at a specific point. There is also discussion about the nature of electric potential as a relative measure rather than an absolute one.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the nature of electric potential and its reference points. Some participants suggest reconsidering the assumptions about potential and its measurement, while others express uncertainty about the clarity of the original question.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the question may lack specificity regarding the reference point for potential, and there is mention of a diagram that may influence the interpretation of the problem. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding potential differences rather than absolute values.

needingtoknow
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electric dipole consists of a pair of equal but opposite charges, +Q and -Q separated by a distance d. What is the electric potential at the point that's midway between these source charges?

Through using the formula electric potential = kQ/r, I found the electric potential at P to be 0. Electric potential is the amount of potential energy each coulomb of charge would possesses in an electric field right, so then why is it 0. If I place a negative charge at Point P, won't it be attracted to the +ve charge and repel by the negative charge. Won't it use potential energy to accelerate towards the +ve charge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
needingtoknow said:
I found the electric potential at P to be 0. Electric potential is the amount of potential energy each coulomb of charge would possesses in an electric field right, so then why is it 0. If I place a negative charge at Point P, won't it be attracted to the +ve charge and repel by the negative charge. Won't it use potential energy to accelerate towards the +ve charge?
You're confusing potential with gradient of potential. The field is the gradient of the potential, and this is what causes the force on a test charge.

I don't like the question, though. Potentials are not absolute. It's only potential difference that matters. You can take the potential at any point to be your reference potential (zero) and measure all other potentials in relation to it. The question only works if you specify also that the potential at infinity is zero.
 
Does it matter that the point is 0 V only relative to other points as well. I don't think I am asking the question correctly, so I have attached a picture of the question which has the diagram too. It is part b).
 

Attachments

  • physics question.PNG
    physics question.PNG
    15.2 KB · Views: 600
needingtoknow said:
Does it matter that the point is 0 V only relative to other points as well.
Not exactly sure what you are asking there.
There is nothing special about 0V, it's an arbitrary reference point. As the attachment states, what matters is potential difference, i.e. the difference in voltage between two points.

The attachment says the diagram shows "the electric potential at various points in the field they produce". That's a little misleading, because you could add some constant to every value and it would be effectively the same. On the other hand, it is customary to set the 0 V level as the potential "at infinity", which is perhaps assumed here. Or, equivalently, you could interpret the statement as meaning the charges add those potentials to an assumed background potential of zero everywhere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K