Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

An integral of the Planck radiation law- 2.701kT

  1. May 30, 2003 #1


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    an integral of the Planck radiation law-- 2.701kT

    this is classical (vintage 1905) physics---kind of cute

    Planck's radiation law (one of the things that kicked off QM)
    can be written to show the numbers of photons at each frequency--in effect, a bar graph showing how the population of thermal photons at some temperature is distributed by freq.
    It is continuous, but otherwise rather like a bar graph.

    If you integrate this form of the radiation law you can learn the energy of an average photon, or equivalently the average quantum frequency.

    Average quantum energy turns out to be 2.701kT
    where k is Boltzmann k, and T is temp.

    Average angular freq is that divided by hbar.

    Now the question is, what is this number 2.701.

    Turns out its an offspring of the Riemann zeta function :wink:

    Look at sum of reciprocal fourth powers divided by sum of reciprocal cubes.

    1+ 1/16+1/81 + 1/256 +... divided by 1 + 1/8 +1/27 + 1/64 +...

    That times three is 2.701...

    It is a mathematical constant like pi---which is also calculable by a series.

    the Riemann zeta function is a sum of reciprocal x-th powers of the natural numbers. its good for number theory, studying primes etc. But here it is somehow related to heat. The heat glow off of warm objects. Thermal radiation.

    My advice: Remember the constant 2.701 and forget the number theory. It gives a handle on the thermal radiation at any temperature.
    Last edited: May 30, 2003
  2. jcsd
  3. May 30, 2003 #2
    I've always enjoyed number theory

    even made a couple of discoveries myself, nice to know there is such a direct link to a physical problem. If anyone is looking for a good description of the Blackbody Problem there is one in Abraham Pais's book about Einstein and in "The Quantum Physicists" and when I think of the author's name I'll edit it in.

    Planck wanted to develop the area of chemical thermodynamics but found to his dismay that the American Josiah Willard Gibbs had completely covered the subject. Not until Berzelius included electrochemistry was anything added to the field. So he took up the unsolved problem of blackbody radiation. It's a case study in creativity and every budding physicist should read about it.
    Last edited: May 31, 2003
  4. May 30, 2003 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Yeah, I really enjoyed pais's technical biography of einstein.
  5. May 31, 2003 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Re: an integral of the Planck radiation law-- 2.701kT

    Actually, the real question is how precisely does the zeta function turn up here in the first place. Would you mind explaining this Marcus?
    Last edited: May 31, 2003
  6. May 31, 2003 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Re: Re: an integral of the Planck radiation law-- 2.701kT

    I yield to you. You are welcome to give the explanation.

    I worked thru this years ago in grad school-----it involves a series of integrals which are integration-by-parts, each step accumulating one of the 1/n3 terms.

    You have presumably seen the proof more recently since you are a "young" researcher, as you said recently. So why dont you explain?

    BTW did you happen to know that zeta(4) = pi4/90?
    Answer honestly please :wink:
  7. May 31, 2003 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Re: I've always enjoyed number theory

    Tyger, I appreciate the Liberal Arts breadth here---your signature is, by my reckoning, also the best line out of that play. Curious as to what number theory results have occurred to you. I played around with series as a kid and found some things (but of course were already known!)

    Havent read Pais book. I wonder if it has this little known fact about Planck. This is amazing and goes against the conventional picture.
    His 1899 paper "On irreversible radiaton processes" (IIRC) contains a list of the planck units, including temperature.
    All of them---length, mass, time, etc---have roughly the same values we have today. I have looked at the original in
    German and also examined it in translation. Can testify to this.

    But Planck's constant did not appear until the 1900 paper on the black body radiation spectrum!

    Yet we know, or believe we know, that the Planck units are based on hbar, G, and c. How did they emerge in Planck's mind even before the usual h constant? How did he think of them and calculate them before he even discovered the black body radiation law?

    For historical richness----the 1899 paper was presented in the spring of that year in Berlin before a meeting of the (get this)
    "Prussian Academy of Sciences". You can see that it was Gibbsian
    in its inspiration---obsessed with thermodynamics but applying it to light itself.

    I'll try to find my xerox of the paper and correct the title if I have it wrong here.


    PS: ζ(4) = 1 + 1/16 + 1/81 +.... = pi4/90
  8. May 31, 2003 #7


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Re: Re: Re: an integral of the Planck radiation law-- 2.701kT

    1. Yes.

    2. Asking you to do it didn't seem out of line since you began this thread.

    3. I think that's great. Would you mind talking a little about what you studied and the origin of your interest in physics?
  9. May 31, 2003 #8
    Here's a number theory result

    that I've worked out, already posted to the board. So far as I can find I'm the only one to have derived it.


    Number Theory is just an occasional intertainment to me, but still it's nice to know that I solved a 150 year old riddle that has stumped some of the great minds.
  10. Jun 1, 2003 #9


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed

    Re: Here's a number theory result

    I am impressed.
    I looked it over but did not check details, but assuming that
    it is all right then it is a very nice result.
    there is a journal of recreational mathematics
    did you ever see it?
    I think the most efficient way to find out if what you discovered
    is known is to submit it for publication
    If you live close to a university
    the math reference librarian at the math library would
    show you some of the journals that publish
    cute, nifty, but minor results.
    I liked what you said about "cerulean" blue of the sky
    Cerulean is a good word.
    But I fail to understand how scattering from molecules does
    not "significantly contribute" it. Do you?
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook