Insights An Introduction to Theorema Primum

  • Thread starter Thread starter neilparker62
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Introduction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the geometric principles underlying Nicolaus Copernicus's work, particularly in "De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium." It emphasizes the importance of "Copernican geometry," which utilizes straight lines, arcs, and plane and spherical triangles. The conversation highlights the limitations of Euclid's Elements in providing the necessary tools for deriving sides from angles and vice versa, underscoring the need for a more comprehensive geometric framework to support Copernicus's revolutionary ideas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic geometric concepts, including straight lines and arcs.
  • Familiarity with plane and spherical triangles.
  • Knowledge of Euclid's Elements and its limitations in geometric proofs.
  • Basic comprehension of historical scientific methodologies, particularly in astronomy.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Copernican geometry" and its applications in modern astronomy.
  • Study advanced geometric proofs beyond Euclid's Elements.
  • Explore the historical context of "De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium."
  • Investigate the mathematical techniques for deriving angles and sides in geometry.
USEFUL FOR

Students of astronomy, historians of science, mathematicians, and educators interested in the geometric foundations of astronomical theories.

neilparker62
Mentor
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,200
Reaction score
703
Introduction
Whilst no doubt most frequenters of “Physics Forums” will be familiar with Nicolaus Copernicus as the scientist who advanced the (at the time) radical thesis that the Earth revolved around the sun rather than vice versa, a perhaps less well-known aspect of his work is the “nuts and bolts” geometry underlying his ground-breaking treatise: “De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium” (On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres).  In this article (and perhaps others to follow), we analyse “Copernican geometry” in light of its stated intent:
Because the proofs which we shall use in almost the entire work deal with straight lines and arcs, with plane and spherical triangles, and because Euclid’s Elements, although they clear up much of this, do not have what is here most required, namely how to find the sides from the angles and the angles from the sides, since the angle does not measure the subtending straight line – just as the line does not measure the angle – but the arc does...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K