Insights An Introduction to Theorema Primum

  • Thread starter Thread starter neilparker62
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Introduction
Click For Summary
The discussion introduces the concept of "Copernican geometry," emphasizing its significance in Nicolaus Copernicus's work, particularly in "De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium." It highlights the geometric principles underlying Copernicus's revolutionary ideas, focusing on the importance of straight lines, arcs, and triangles in his proofs. The text critiques Euclid's Elements for lacking methods to derive sides from angles and vice versa, noting that arcs are essential for accurate measurements. This analysis aims to explore the geometric foundations that supported Copernicus's heliocentric model. The exploration of these geometric concepts will continue in future articles.
neilparker62
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
1,198
Reaction score
693
Introduction
Whilst no doubt most frequenters of “Physics Forums” will be familiar with Nicolaus Copernicus as the scientist who advanced the (at the time) radical thesis that the Earth revolved around the sun rather than vice versa, a perhaps less well-known aspect of his work is the “nuts and bolts” geometry underlying his ground-breaking treatise: “De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium” (On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres).  In this article (and perhaps others to follow), we analyse “Copernican geometry” in light of its stated intent:
Because the proofs which we shall use in almost the entire work deal with straight lines and arcs, with plane and spherical triangles, and because Euclid’s Elements, although they clear up much of this, do not have what is here most required, namely how to find the sides from the angles and the angles from the sides, since the angle does not measure the subtending straight line – just as the line does not measure the angle – but the arc does...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K