Analysis (implicit and inverse func thrms)

  • Thread starter Thread starter steviet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Inverse
steviet
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The equations:

uz - 2e^(vz) = 0
u - x^2 - y^2 = 0
v^2 - xy*log(v) - 1 = 0

define z (implicitly) as a function of (u,v) and (u,v) as a function of (x,y),
thus z as a function f (x,y)

Describe the role of the inverse and implicit function theorems in the
above statement and compute

\partialz/\partialx(0,e).

(Note that when x=0 and y=e, u=e^2, v=1 and z=2)

Homework Equations



Implicit and inverse function theorems

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm finally starting to get a grasp on the 2 theorems and their
respective proofs (I hope), but as far as explaining their role in this
concrete example I'm a little lost.
If anyone can put me on the right path, it would be greatly appreciated.
(This is for an undergrad analysis course)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps it would be a good idea to check on exactly what the "implicit function theorem" and ""inverse function theorem" say!

In particular you might want to determine where, if ever, the Jacobian is zero.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top