Analytical Classical Dynamics: An intermediate level course

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a comprehensive set of lecture notes for an upper-division course in analytical classical dynamics, emphasizing analytical approaches to classical mechanics. Key topics include oscillations, Keplerian orbits, two-body scattering, and the dynamics of rigid bodies, alongside Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics. The course aims to deepen understanding of complex dynamics through rigorous analytical methods. Participants express appreciation for the resource, highlighting its academic value. Overall, the notes serve as a significant educational tool for students studying classical dynamics.
Greg Bernhardt
Admin
Insights Author
Messages
19,773
Reaction score
10,725
A complete set of lecture notes for an upper-division classical dynamics course. The course concentrates on those aspects of classical dynamics which can be studied analytically. Topics covered include oscillations, Keplerian orbits, two-body scattering, rotating frames of reference, rotation of rigid bodies in three dimensions, Lagrangian mechanics, Hamiltonian mechanics, and coupled oscillations.

http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/336k/lectures.pdf
by: Richard Fitzpatrick (University of Texas)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AWESOME

Thanks bro!
 
Dear Greg
thanks for letting me read this book. Lagrange, Hamilton, Foucault, even Maccullough and Poincare
Read you
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Thread 'Free fall of person in a sled to direct horizontal motion by atmospheric resistance'

Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
View full post »

Similar threads

Analytical mechanics for dummies ?
Replies
1
Views
5K
Classical Studying Analytical Mechanics this July
Replies
4
Views
2K
Classical Mechanics: An introductory course
Replies
13
Views
25K
Classical Best analytical mechanics textbook recommandation
Replies
7
Views
15K
Collisions in classical mechanics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Classical What are the best intermediate Newtonian mechanics textbooks?
Replies
23
Views
5K
Classical Mechanics Video Lectures
Replies
4
Views
16K
I Which version of the Kepler Problem is correct?
Replies
4
Views
1K
The difficulty of learning Electromagnetism vs Classical Mechanics
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
Classical What Topics Are Covered in Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems?
Replies
8
Views
14K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top