Analyzing an RC Circuit with a Sudden Switch Closure

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing an RC circuit when a switch is suddenly closed after being open for an extended period. The time constant before the switch is closed is identified as 1.5 seconds, while the current function after the switch closure needs to be determined. Participants clarify that the capacitor will charge until the voltage across it equals the battery voltage, resulting in zero current through the resistor at that point. The series combination of resistors is validated using Kirchhoff's laws, emphasizing that the current distribution changes once the switch is closed. Overall, the analysis hinges on understanding the behavior of capacitors and resistors in series and applying circuit laws correctly.
bassplayer142
Messages
431
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a circuit, the switch S has been open for a long time. It is then suddenly closed. Determine the time constant (a) before the switch is closed (b) after the switch is closed. (c) let the switch be closed at t=0. Determine the current in the switch as a function of time.


Homework Equations


for charging cap
q(t) = CE[1-e^(-t/RC)]
I(t) = E/Re^(-t/RC)
c=q/v v=IR

The Attempt at a Solution



I assume that since it has been open for a long time the cap is fully charged to 1E-6F. Using the first equation I can't find Q because if you plug in q=cv in the equation it is ln(1)=0 then the time is 0. I know that the answer to a is t=1.5s from the back of the book. I guess I just don't know how to find Q. Also, since the 50kohm and 100kohm resistors are in series but not next to each other can I used the series law to make it a 150kohm resistor. I guess I don't know since there is either a capacitor or a battery in between them.
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    4.8 KB · Views: 1,130
Physics news on Phys.org
Capacitors do not get charged up to a certain capacitance, They get charged until the voltage across them is so high that no more current can flow.
If you have a capacitor, a resistor and a battery in series, that point is reached once the voltage across the capacitor is equal to the voltage across the battery, so the voltage across the resistor is 0.

Unfortunately I can't see the picture yet.
 
Last edited:
If the switch is open the resistors and the capacitor will all have the same current passing through them. that means it's OK to swap two of them around. You can prove this with kirchhofs loop law. After the switch closes you have two loops with the current in them independent. The sum of those currents goes through the switch
 
So basically I can treat the two resistors as being in series, but when the switch is closed I must use kirchhoff's laws? Sounds right to me.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top