Analyzing Block & Spring Compression: F = -kx & W = -0.5kx^2

AI Thread Summary
A block with a mass of 0.528 kg moving at 3.85 m/s strikes a spring with a constant of 26.7 N/m, resulting in an initial kinetic energy of 3.913 J. In a frictionless scenario, this kinetic energy is fully converted into the spring's elastic potential energy, allowing for maximum compression. However, when friction is present, with a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.411, some energy is lost to friction, reducing the amount of compression. The work done by the spring is calculated using the integral of force over distance, taking into account the direction of work. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the spring's compression under varying conditions.
Pavel1989
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A block of mass 0.528 kg slides with uniform velocity of 3.85 m/s on a horizontal frictionless surface. At some point, it strikes a horizontal spring in equilibrium. If the spring constant is k=26.7 N/m, by how much will the spring be compressed by the time the block comes to rest? What is the amount of compression if the surface is rough under the spring, with a coefficient of kinetic friction uk = 0.411?


F = -kx W = -0.5kx^2 KE = 0.5mv^2



I found that it has 3.913 J of energy once it hits the srping, but how do i use that and incorporate it into the work done by the spring?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The spring mechanical energy = work done by/on the spring.

Without dissipating force (e.g. friction), the kinetic energy of the mass is transformed into the mechanical (elastic) energy stored in the spring.

With friction present, some of the kinetic energy is dissipated by friction.

Think of work = \int_0^x F(s) ds, and there will be + or - sign depending whether work is done on or by the system (e.g. spring).
 
thanks much i think I've got it
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top