Analyzing Inelastic Collisions in 2-D: Solving for Final Velocity and Angle

AI Thread Summary
In an inelastic collision scenario, a 950 kg car traveling at 16 m/s collides with a 1300 kg minivan moving at 21 m/s, resulting in both vehicles sticking together. The momentum conservation equations for both x and y components are set up to find the final speed and direction of the combined wreck. The confusion arises when dividing the y momentum equation by the x momentum equation to eliminate the final velocity, which is a valid mathematical approach as long as the denominators are not zero. This method allows for solving the angle of deflection without needing the final velocity directly. Understanding this technique is crucial for solving similar physics problems effectively.
Hurricane3
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car with mass of 950 kg and speed of 16 m/s approches an intersection in the positive x direction. A 1300-kg minivan traveling at 21m/s is heading towards the same intersection in the positive y direction. The car and minivan collide and stick together. Fine the speed and direction of the wrecked vehicles just after the collision, assuming external forces can be ignored.


Homework Equations


p = mv
\sum p before = \sum after


The Attempt at a Solution



Well this question was grabbed from my physics textbook as an example question.

Here are the steps they preformed:

1. Set the initial x component of momentum equal to the final x component of momentum
m_{1}v_{1} = (m_{1} + m_{2})v_{f}cos\vartheta

2. Do the same of the y component of momentum.
m_{2}v_{2} = (m_{2} + m_{2})v_{f}sin\vartheta

I understand everything up to this part, but I got confused when they divide the y momentum equation by the x momentum equation. They did it to eliminate the final velocity, giving an equation solving for \vartheta alone.

My question is: Why is it that you can divide to eliminate variables??

Oh, and those are suppose to be subscripts, not superscripts...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
\sin^2\theta+\cos^2\theta=1

Just put \sin\theta and \cos\theta

And unknown left is v(f)
 
Hurricane3 said:

Homework Statement


A car with mass of 950 kg and speed of 16 m/s approches an intersection in the positive x direction. A 1300-kg minivan traveling at 21m/s is heading towards the same intersection in the positive y direction. The car and minivan collide and stick together. Fine the speed and direction of the wrecked vehicles just after the collision, assuming external forces can be ignored.


Homework Equations


p = mv
\sum p before = \sum after


The Attempt at a Solution



Well this question was grabbed from my physics textbook as an example question.

Here are the steps they preformed:

1. Set the initial x component of momentum equal to the final x component of momentum
m_{1}v_{1} = (m_{1} + m_{2})v_{f}cos\vartheta

2. Do the same of the y component of momentum.
m_{2}v_{2} = (m_{2} + m_{2})v_{f}sin\vartheta

I understand everything up to this part, but I got confused when they divide the y momentum equation by the x momentum equation. They did it to eliminate the final velocity, giving an equation solving for \vartheta alone.

My question is: Why is it that you can divide to eliminate variables??

Oh, and those are suppose to be subscripts, not superscripts...

You can always divide two equations. If A = B and C=D, then the ratio A/C must equal B/D as long as C and D are not zero. This is a common trick.
 
ahh okay thanks.

i never did it this way before :shy:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top